Thursday, 14 March 2019

Incinerating plastic waste "does nothing to reduce demand for new plastic products and even less to mitigate climate change"

How do we see incineration?

In Vienna, they have a state-of-the-art facility - which also looks like a piece of art:


Müllverbrennungsanlage Spittelau – Wikipedia
Spittelau | Waste incineration | Energy generation | Energy supply | About us | Wien Energie
In Vienna, energy is also art - VIENNA – Now. Forever

In the UK this method of dealing with waste is seen less favourably:
Futures Forum: Incinerating rubbish 'will increase air pollution, exacerbate climate change and threaten much-needed recycling'

National Geographic looks at the situation in the US and beyond: 

Is burning plastic waste a good idea?

Many within the trash industry think so. But incineration and other “waste-to-energy” projects may pose dangers to the environment.


BY ELIZABETH ROYTE

PUBLISHED MARCH 12, 2019

This article was created in partnership with the National Geographic Society.

WHAT IS TO be done with the swelling flood of plastic waste, if we don’t want to see it snagged in tree branches, floating in ocean gyres, or clogging the stomachs of seabirds and whales?

Plastic production is expected to double in the next 20 years, according to a report issued by the World Economic Forum. Plastic recycling rates, meanwhile, hover around 30 percent in Europe, just nine percent in the U.S., and zero or close to it in much of the developing world.

This past January, a consortium of petrochemical and consumer-goods companies called the Alliance to End Plastic Waste, including Exxon, Dow, Total, Shell, Chevron Phillips, and Procter & Gamble, committed to spending $1.5 billion over five years on the problem. Their aim is to support alternative materials and delivery systems, beef up recycling programs, and—more controversially—promote technologies that convert plastics to fuel or energy.

Sophisticated incinerators that burn plastic and other municipal waste can produce enough heat and steam to turn turbine blades and generate electricity for the local grid. The European Union, which restricts the landfilling of organic waste, already burns almost 42 percent of its waste; the U.S. burns 12.5 percent. According to the World Energy Council, a U.N. accredited network that represents a range of energy sources and technologies, the waste-to-energy sector is likely to witness steady growth in coming years, especially in the Asia Pacific region. China already has some 300 waste-to-energy plants operating, with another several hundred in the pipeline.

"As countries like China close their doors to foreign waste and an overburdened recycling industry fails to keep up with the plastic pollution crisis,” says John Hocevar of Greenpeace, “incineration will increasingly be pushed as an easy alternative.”


...

Zero-waste advocates worry that any approach to converting plastic waste into energy does nothing to reduce demand for new plastic products and even less to mitigate climate change. “To uplift these approaches is to distract from real solutions,” says Claire Arkin, a campaigner with the Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives—that is, solutions that allow people to use less plastic and reuse and recycle more.

No comments:

Post a Comment