... A FORUM TO STIMULATE DEBATE ... ... JUST ADD A COMMENT AT ANY ENTRY BELOW... ... FOR THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TOWN AND VALLEY ...
Showing posts with label sarah wollaston mp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sarah wollaston mp. Show all posts

Wednesday, 20 February 2019

Brexit: and Totnes' independent MP

The MP for Totnes has been very outspoken:
Futures Forum: Brexit: and Totnes' MP calling for a peoples' vote

She has become 'Devon't most influential MP': 

How family GP Sarah Wollaston became Devon's most influential MP

She has become an outspoken opponent of her own party leadership when the party line goes against the best interests of her constituents.


Guy Henderson Chief Reporter5 DEC 2017

From the moment she was chosen as the Conservative candidate for the Totnes constituency, Dr Sarah Wollaston was on course to become Devon's most influential MP. In a little over seven years she has become an outspoken opponent of her own party leadership when the party line goes against what she believes are the best interests of her constituents.Her selection for the Totnes constituency was the first of its kind. She was the first person to be selected through a postal open primary, in which voters of all parties were invited to have their say on the candidacy.













How family GP Sarah Wollaston became Devon's most influential MP - Devon Live

The idea of an 'open primary' was controversial at the time - some ten years ago:
Open primaries are an open invitation for political mischief - Telegraph
Sarah Wollaston: GP, mother and Conservative Parliamentary candidate - Telegraph
GP becomes Tory candidate in first 'open primary' election - Telegraph

And yet the Telegraph liked the idea of an 'independent' Tory:
Here's to Sarah Wollaston: the Tory tweeter who cannot be silenced - Telegraph

Here is Dr Wollaston writing in the Telegraph five years ago: 

Why open primaries make for better MPs

Open primaries get the public involved in politics - and produce better MPs, says Dr Sarah Wollaston

Voters tend to prefer candidates with a connection both to real life and their local area 

By Dr Sarah Wollaston, MP for Totnes
15 Oct 2014

Parliament still doesn't look or sound much like modern Britain. We have a long way to go, not only to balance gender and ethnic minority representation but also the background of our MPs. To put it bluntly, we need more parliamentarians who haven't spent a lifetime trying to get there.

The problem for those who come from outside the Westminster bubble is getting selected to fight winnable seats when the selection system tends to favour the default option of former insiders. Truly open postal primaries hand the decision making to an entire constituency and, far from discriminating against those without a track record, voters tend to prefer candidates with a connection both to real life and their local area.

Open primaries make an even greater difference in seats which rarely change political allegiance; where currently a tiny selection committee in effect dictates the MP who will represent the wider electorate, sometimes for decades to come. In marginals, they focus the mind of Parties, not on their favoured sons and daughters, but on putting forward a choice of individuals who are most likely to appeal to the widest electorate.

I had never been to a political meeting before applying to become an MP but had spent 24 years in clinical medicine as well as teaching. It was the decision of the Totnes Conservative Association to take a chance on shortlisting me for the first fully open postal primary in 2009 despite my lack of political experience.

Every registered voter received a postal ballot including a leaflet from each of the three candidates and a return paid envelope and a public hustings was held for those who wanted to come to grill us in person.

One neighbouring MP called on his Party's supporters to sabotage the primary by voting for the person he judged would be least likely to win; it backfired as this undemocratic intervention was resented and the turnout was higher than expected at 25%.

Did it make any difference? Even now, four and a half years on, people who didn't vote for me at the general election remind me that they supported me at the Primary. They're glad to have had a say in the type of Tory who represents them in Parliament.

For my Association, far from losing control of the process, they were able to shortlist not one but three candidates, any of whom they would have been happy to support but confident that the eventual winner of the primary would also be more likely to command local support. Several people told me that, having supporting me in the primary, they wanted to do so again on the day.

As for myself, being elected twice, I have always felt an extra responsibility to be everyone's MP; perhaps in part why I am less tribal in my approach to politics and followed a scrutiny role within Parliament, now as Chair of the Health Select Committee.

This week, voters across Rochester and Strood will receive their own open postal primary ballot papers. Both candidates have strong local connections as well as local government experience; Anna Firth is a former barrister and Kelly Tolhurst runs a marine surveying business.

I hope UKIP do not set out to undermine this democratic fully open primary, if they did it would be a direct challenge to their first elected MP, Douglas Carswell, who has long championed their cause.

I hope that all Parties will look at how full open primaries can be made cheaper and more accessible but that will depend on voters in Rochester and Strood demonstrating their appetite for democratic reform.


Why open primaries make for better MPs - Telegraph

The point being that such a process means that a candidate and MP is less beholden to the local party association and its members - and more to their constituents:
Futures Forum: Brexit: and two-thirds of Conservative Party members opting for "no-deal rather than a bad deal"

Which is why she's been under threat of deselection:
Threats to deselect Totnes MP Sarah Wollaston – the PRSD

The former Prime Minister talked yesterday about 'entryism':
Sir John Major: Extreme fringes are manipulating the Tories and Labour - Telegraph

Which has been a concern voiced by others for some time:
Tory Remainers warn party is being infiltrated by 'purple Momentum' | Daily Mail Online
Tory grassroots deny 'Blukip' infiltration as MP defectors accuse 'tyrannical associations' of falling victim to 'Purple Momentum' - Telegraph

When it came to Brexit, Dr Wollaston was originally a Leaver - but changed her mind:
EU referendum: Respected Tory MP Sarah Wollaston quits Leave campaign over 'false' NHS claims | The Independent

And now she's left the party:
Live updates as Sarah Wollaston quits Conservatives to join Independents Group - Devon Live 

Conservative MP Sarah Wollaston writes to Totnes constituents to explain Independents Group switch

20 February 2019 

Sarah Wollaston has quit the Conservatives to join the newly-formed Independents Group.

The Totnes MP, the first to have been elected via an open postal primary, announced her decision to leave the Tories along with Heidi Allen and Anna Soubry on Wednesday morning.

The trio have opted to join the Independents Group, which was formed earlier this week after seven MPs defected from the Labour Party.

In a letter to her constituents, Dr Wollaston said she could no longer remain a member of a party, “whose leadership has become so driven by the demands” of others.

“I do not share their right-wing values or those of the UKIP supporters who have been urged to join the Conservative Party via aggressive and well-funded social media campaigns in order to deselect moderate MPs,” she wrote.

The final straw has been the Government’s mishandling of Brexit. Despite the PM losing her majority, no meaningful attempt was made to reach out to heal the divisions left by the referendum or to seek a cross party, or national consensus, on the way forward.

The Totnes Conservative Association Chair said he was "saddened" by Dr Wollaston's departure.

The 57-year-old, who was elected in November 2017, went on to blame Brexit for “squandering the energy of Government”.

She also said the uncertainty surrounding Theresa May’s ongoing negotiations with the EU, and the prospect of a no-deal Brexit, was partly responsible for some companies opting to leave the UK - like Honda, Jaguar Land Rover and Nissan.



11:44 - 20 Feb 2019
Retweet
Reply
Favourite

Dr Wollaston’s letter to constituents, in full, below:

With regret, I have decided to resign the Conservative Party whip. I am passionate about this constituency and proud to have been the first Conservative parliamentary candidate to be selected via a full open postal primary. This gave every registered voter in the Totnes constituency, regardless of party affiliation, the opportunity to decide which Conservative candidate they would prefer. From the outset, I have made the case for a centrist, moderate and outward looking approach to our politics. I assure you that I will continue to take that approach but will now do so as an independent MP. I will carry on working constructively with the many hard-working Conservative councillors across this constituency, for whom I have the greatest respect. My decision is no reflection on them.

However, at a national level the Conservative Party appears to have abandoned attempts to modernise or to broaden its appeal and has instead become less tolerant and more inward-looking. I can no longer remain a member of a party whose leadership has become so driven by the demands of the ERG and the DUP. I do not share their right wing values or those of the UKIP supporters who have been urged to join the Conservative Party via aggressive and well-funded social media campaigns in order to deselect moderate MPs.

The final straw has been the Government’s mishandling of Brexit. Despite the PM losing her majority, no meaningful attempt was made to reach out to heal the divisions left by the referendum or to seek a cross Party, or national consensus, on the way forward. The 48% who voted to remain are marginalised and alienated and many Leave voters have also been left exasperated by the PM’s Deal. The trade-offs and compromises in the Withdrawal Agreement and Future Framework mean that the Deal is a long way from the unrealistic promises made during the referendum campaign.

Brexit has consumed and squandered the energy of Government, Parliament and our political parties. That together with a shift to the right by the Conservatives has undermined efforts to tackle the ‘burning injustices’ that the PM pledged to address on entering Downing Street.

We have reached a precarious moment in our national life. Nothing has divided us like Brexit and we now face the serious prospect of crashing out of the EU in less than 40 days’ time with No Deal and no transition. This would not be a ‘clean Brexit’ as some have chosen to represent it. The serious real-world consequences would harm people not only in this constituency but across the whole of the UK and beyond. We are already seeing clear evidence of the consequences for people working in companies like Honda, Jaguar Land Rover, Nissan, Dyson, Fly BMI, Panasonic and for sectors like the pharmaceutical industry following the relocation of expertise and jobs with the European Medicines Agency. It is also starting to hit local businesses.

The truth is that No Deal Brexit would deal a body blow to our economy, putting jobs and livelihoods at risk as well as crushing the opportunity to reverse austerity. Having looked at the evidence of the damage it would inflict, I cannot support a No Deal Brexit and I wholly reject the PM’s false binary choice between that grim option and her own deeply flawed Deal. I have for many weeks said that I would resign the whip if No Deal became the stated policy of the Government but also that I would do so if running down the clock amounted to the same.

I believe that everyone deserves the right to examine and weigh up the pros and cons of the Deal and to have the final say in a referendum. This would offer the opportunity to confirm Brexit and proceed rapidly with implementation or to remain. Without that valid consent, I believe there will be decades of acrimony about the consequences.

The Labour Party has also changed beyond repair. It is now permanently in the grip of the hard left and tainted by its failure to root out anti-Semitism, these are some of the reasons why several of its MPs have already decided that they too must resign the whip. I will be sitting alongside them in a new centre grouping of independent MPs who share a common set of values, The Independent Group. We agree with the millions of people who feel that neither main political party represents them and that there needs to be a new offer at the heart of our politics.

I know that being an MP is an enormous privilege and I remain hugely grateful to everyone who has supported me. I know some will now call for me to stand in a by election but neither this nor a general election would answer the fundamental question that is dividing us… for that we need a referendum on the final Brexit deal. I will be listening carefully to views about The Independent Group and how this could develop in the future. I remain absolutely committed to this constituency.

Last updated Wed 20 Feb 2019

Thursday, 10 January 2019

Brexit: and the County Council in denial

The County Council seems to prefer to bury its head in the Brexit sands...

Any mention of Brexit in the context of Flybe's problems is to be avoided:
Futures Forum: Brexit: and Flybe's warnings
Futures Forum: Brexit: and Flybe for sale

Cllr Martin Shaw reports: 

Devon Tories in denial about role of Brexit in Flybe crisis

At yesterday’s County Council, Cllr Rufus Gilbert, Cabinet member for Economy and Skills, reported on the Council’s efforts to support Flybe’s operations at Exeter Airport after the company was forced to put itself up for sale (Virgin has shown interest but nothing has yet been agreed). I think that DCC and other local councils have done what they should in the crisis, including an offer to explore additional projects for the company’s Training Academy.
However the fact remains that the last two-and-a-half years of Brexit uncertainty and the plummeting pound it has caused have helped undermine the airline. As Sky’s City editor reported, ‘Sources said a combination of Brexit-related uncertainty‎, the weaker pound and soaring fuel costs had led Flybe’s directors to conclude that a takeover was likely to be required to preserve its future.’
I asked Cllr Gilbert if he agreed that it was shocking that the Government’s policies had led to this threat to Devon’s air services and our regional airport. But he was having none of it. “Brexit had nothing to do with it’, was all he could say.
Devon Tories in denial about role of Brexit in Flybe crisis « SEATON & COLYTON matters

The independent councillor isn't simply indulging in a little Tory-bashing: 

Kent County Council, which has a huge Tory majority, yesterday published an alarming report on the consequences of a no-deal Brexit for its county. At Devon County Council however, the Conservatives ganged up to prevent my urgent motion being discussed...

While Kent County Council publishes alarming report on Brexit threat, the complacent Tory majority on Devon County Council blocks discussion of my urgent motion on the crisis « SEATON & COLYTON matters 
Futures Forum: Brexit: and County Council avoiding a vote - on a People's Vote

Particularly alarming, though, is how unprepared the council is for the impending no-deal Brexit:
Futures Forum: Brexit: and how prepared local authorities are

Cllr Shaw has just released this posting on his website: 

‘We haven’t got a clue yet’, says County Council leader about No Deal planning

At yesterday’s DCC Cabinet meeting, Leader John Hart answered three questions I had put in writing about estimated risks from Theresa May’s Brexit and No Deal, about help to businesses for No Deal, and emergency planning for disruption to fuel, food and medical supplies in Devon as a result of No Deal.
Cllr Hart did not answer any of my questions. When I asked when he would answer them, he said ‘We haven’t got a clue yet’ about what is going to happen, and that there would be a meeting next week, with just 10 weeks left to when the UK will crash out of the EU with No Deal if no change is made. 
It can be seen that there are no protections in place to protect Devon from the effects of a No Deal. Economy Cabinet member Cllr Rufus Gilbert said ‘we can’t plan for a hypothetical’. Yet No Deal is the default scenario for 29th March.
This is why Devon and Dorset MPs like Ben Bradshaw, Sarah Wollaston and Oliver Letwin are absolutely right to try to block No Deal. I told Cabinet it was irresponsible of them not to support these moves.
‘We haven’t got a clue yet’, says County Council leader about No Deal planning « SEATON & COLYTON matters
dcc-leaders-replies-on-no-deal-brexit-9.1.19.pdf
.
.
.

Sunday, 9 December 2018

Brexit: and County Council avoiding a vote - on a People's Vote

Devon voted for Brexit, but there have been moves in the other direction:
Futures Forum: Brexit: and Totnes' MP calling for a peoples' vote

Today, Radio Exe asks the question:
Is Devon now a Remainer? - Radio Exe

Devon Live reports in full:

Council votes not to discuss motion calling for a People's Vote on Brexit deal

Instead, the motion was referred to cabinet to discuss at a later date before coming back to full council in February


Daniel Clark Local Democracy Reporter
7 DEC 2018



Councillors voted not to discuss a motion calling for Devon County Council to support a People’s Vote over Brexit at Thursday’s full council meeting.

The motion of Cllr Martin Shaw said that in the light of polling evidence which suggests that a majority of Devon voters and Devon districts now oppose Brexit, Devon County Council calls on the Government to organise a referendum on the deal.

But the Conservative-led authority instead chose to refer the motion to its Cabinet, who would then make a recommendation back to full council, as per the usual procedure of notice of motions.



People's Vote campaigners outside County Hall (Image: Daniel Clark)

This came despite Cllr Shaw arguing the motion should be discussed at the meeting in light of its urgency given Parliament will vote on the negotiated deal next week and that the next full council meeting is on February 21, 2019.

READ MORE
Business say they are facing 'dark days' as Brexit chaos continues - Devon Live
Devon council boss warns over Brexit nursing care shortages - Devon Live
Barden factory closure: Warning more companies could leave Plymouth in Brexit fear - Plymouth Live

Labour, Liberal Democrat and Independent Group members all voted for the council to discuss the motion today, but the ruling Conservative en-masse voted for it to be referred to the Cabinet. Calls for a recorded vote were also lost in the same way.

Cllr Shaw, calling for the motion to be discussed today, said: “It is self-evident that there is a matter of urgency in discussing this today due to when Parliament makes its very important decision. The motion may well be redundant by the time the cabinet meets in January and full council in February.

READ MORE
People’s Vote is the only way out of Brexit gridlock Parliament is facing


“I am affronted by the idea that the council might not get the chance to discuss this motion in a timely fashion. We would be saying however damaged and badly affected we would be by the process of Brexit, or if we crash out without a deal or sign up to a deal that both the Brexit and Remain camps think is a bad deal, it will be on record that the council did not discuss the deal and they did not want the people to have the chance to vote on it.”


People's Vote campaigners outside County Hall (Image: Daniel Clark)

Devon For Europe supporters had congregated outside County Hall prior to the meeting to show their support for the motion and to call for a People’s Vote.

Cllr Emma Brennan, who was wearing a Devon For Europe T-shirt during the meeting, shouted ‘shame on you’ when the vote to discuss the motion during Thursday’s meeting was lost.

The motion calling for a People’s Vote was then unanimously approved by the full council to be referred to cabinet and then back to full council with a recommendation for February’s meeting.


Council votes not to discuss motion calling for a People's Vote on Brexit deal - Devon Live
.
.
.

Tuesday, 13 November 2018

Brexit: and the challenges facing our health and social care services

The MP for Totnes and chair of the Commons Heath and Social Care Committee is anxious that Brexit will damage the NHS - and has called for a rethink:
Futures Forum: Brexit: and Totnes' MP calling for a peoples' vote

The MP for Exeter is also a member of the Commons Heath and Social Care Committee - and earlier in the year gave a summary of the views of the committee following their publication of a report:
Futures Forum: Brexit: and impacting on the quality of healthcare



Ben Bradshaw MP: "Our health service face one of the most significant impacts from Brexit" - YouTube

These were the concerns half a year ago:
Futures Forum: Brexit: and 'Can we have our £350m for the NHS, please?'
Futures Forum: Brexit: and post truth politics: no extra money for the NHS
Futures Forum: Brexit: and "a bonus for the NHS"
Futures Forum: Brexit: and the future of healthcare
Futures Forum: Brexit: and £350million for Devon's hospitals 


And since then we've had the empty promises of the 'NHS dividend':
Futures Forum: Brexit: and the "NHS dividend"
Futures Forum: Brexit: and the "NHS dividend": and planned CCG cuts in Devon

And people do not think things are going well:
Futures Forum: Brexit: and the NHS in the South West

There has been a spat over whether or not the MP for Exeter has the time or space to meet up with Devon County Councillors to talk about such matters:

MP responds to claims he won't meet with Devon County Council unless they support a People's Vote on Brexit

Cllr Andrew Leadbetter had asked to get to try and fix some meetings with Ben Bradshaw


Daniel Clark

Local Democracy Reporter
13 NOV 2018

(Image: Parliament TV)

Exeter’s MP Ben Bradshaw has defended accusations that he refused to meet with Devon County Council unless 'they support a People's Vote on Brexit'.

Cllr Andrew Leadbetter, who is the cabinet member for Adult Social Care and Health Services for Devon County Council, had asked to get to try and fix some meetings with Mr Bradshaw in his Westminster diary to discuss adult social care and the challenges that the county council will face they set their budget in February.

However, a response to Cllr Leadbetter from Ben’s parliamentary team said that: “I’m afraid that given the unfolding disaster of Brexit, including for local government finances and our public services generally, and the urgency of securing a People’s Vote, Ben is currently only scheduling meetings with organisations that are actively and publicly supporting a People’s Vote.

“If this is Devon County Council’s policy, Ben would be happy to meet. Otherwise, he is happy to be briefed/kept up to date via email.”

Cllr Andrew Leadbetter

No debate has yet been held by Devon County Council as to whether they support a People’s Vote or not.

Cllr Leadbetter said that the response ‘flies in the face of democracy’. He added: “Our MP is refusing to see me – or discuss/help with the issues that affect his constituents. I believe that this is discriminatory. Devon County Council, and me, we help everybody, irrespective of their views or how they voted.”

However Mr Bradshaw said that the email was ‘misunderstood’ by Cllr Leadbetter, he urged lobbyists to correspond in writing to him, and that if he is to come to London, he should speak to Devon Tory MPs to work out how to work together to prevent the ‘unfolding disaster’ of Brexit.

Mr Bradshaw added: "Mr Leadbetter misunderstands my email. I regularly meet constituents to discuss and help them with their pressing personal problems. I also get several hundred requests a week from organisations, like Devon County Council, wanting to meet me to lobby me on a policy issue. I urge all of them to do so via correspondence, which saves them and me time.

“Devon County Council lobbies me regularly, often to complain about some aspect of Government policy on which I usually agree with them. As a member of the Commons Heath and Social Care Committee I am acutely aware of the challenges our health and social care services are facing and I look forward to receiving Mr Leadbetter’s views on the matter.

“Given the current Brexit mess is going to make the situation much, much worse, if he’s coming up to Westminster, Mr Leadbetter might like to speak to Devon’s Tory MPs, including the excellent chair of our Select Committee, Sarah Wollaston, about how we can all work together to prevent this unfolding disaster.”

He added that he regularly is lobbied by Devon County Council and takes note of the correspondence, including a recent letter he was copied into that was sent to Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care.

The letter, sent by Cllr John Hart, leader of Devon County Council, said: “I am writing following a recent discussion by my Cabinet about the lack of funding for public health in Devon.

“It makes sense to ensure that part of the Government's new money for the NHS is invested in prevention and specifically public health within local authorities. Devon County Council has seen its Public Health Grant allocation reduce significantly since the Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR) in 2015, which was in addition to the 6.2 per cent contributing in 2014/15, resulting in the local authority having to reduce spend in key preventable areas such as childhood obesity, mental health and public health nursing.

“As you know, Devon has one of the largest elderly populations of any county in England. The demographic pressures resulting from that on health and social care services, mean that a new, dynamic approach to healthy ageing is vital.

“I am well aware of the good work being undertaken by local authority public health teams across the region, but it is work that is crying out for additional investment in prevention. With that additional support they could make a real impact on reducing the pressure on health and social care services.”


MP responds to claims he won't meet with Devon County Council unless they support a People's Vote on Brexit - Devon Live
.
.
.

Monday, 20 August 2018

Brexit: and Totnes' MP calling for a peoples' vote

Here's a little list of what to expect in the event of a no-deal Brexit:
36 things that will happen if Britain crashes out of Europe with no deal | Prospect Magazine

Which is alarming more and more in the county:
Poll: How would you vote in a second EU referendum? | Barnstaple, Bideford and Ilfracombe News - North Devon Gazette | North Devon Gazette
Most South West voters want second Brexit referendum - Devon Live

It has alarmed the MP for Totnes, who has written in the Times today, comparing Brexit with 'major surgery':
Informed consent is essential before Brexit surgery | Comment | The Times

Talk Radio picks up the story: 

Sarah Wollaston calls for people's vote on final Brexit deal and compares it to surgery

By James Hingle

Monday, August 20, 2018

A Conservative MP has backed the call for a People’s Vote on the final Brexit deal, as she likens it to having surgery. Sarah Wollaston, MP for Totnes in Devon, has written an article in The Times that calls for the government to allow the people of Britain the chance to vote on the final deal.

In her article, she compares Brexit to surgery, explaining that before surgery you’re informed about all the risks and benefits of it before going through with it. She said: “If you were about to undergo surgery, you would expect to know what the operation involved and to be informed about all the risks and benefits. It’s called informed consent and no decent surgeon would go ahead without it.

Read more: Our Future, Our Choice: 'Undemocratic' to deny UK a second referendum 

“Brexit certainly is major surgery with far-reaching consequences and the government is about to proceed without informed consent.

“At the time of the referendum the choice was simply to leave or to remain. The type of Brexit was not on the ballot paper, which is like a surgeon asking their patient to consent to an amputation in two years’ time without either of them knowing whether this would involve a few toes or their whole leg.

“Voters were assured that this would be the easiest deal in history and that the world, including the EU, would be queuing at our door to trade on our terms. There would be cake and we would be eating it, alongside every fish that swam in our waters.”


'Compelling case for a People's Vote'


Negotiations with the EU are still ongoing, but some have argued that a no-deal Brexit could be the end result.

“In the real world, instead of a bespoke deal we are all being marched briskly to the edge of the cliff. No deal and no transition look increasingly likely to be the outcome, and is the preferred option of those MPs who have deliberately and fatally undermined the Chequers plan," wrote Wollaston.

“The surgery looks set to be far more radical than anything set out in the referendum and the side-effects and complications of a hard, walk-away, no-deal Brexit with no transition are very different from the promised targeted surgical excision of just the parts of the EU that the Brexiteers didn’t like. Shouldn’t people have an opportunity to weigh up the risks and benefits before proceeding?

“Once we know the final terms there is not just an opportunity but a duty to set out the unintended consequences as well as the potential benefits. There is a compelling case for that to be followed by a people’s vote: we have to make it clear to government that it should not embark on potentially ruinous surgery without the informed consent of the British people.”

Campaign group The People’s Vote has been pushing for a second referendum on the final Brexit deal. This was boosted on Monday with a record £1million donation made to the group from Superdry co-founder Julian Dunkerton.

Sarah Wollaston calls for people's vote on final Brexit deal and compares it to surgery | talkRADIO

And Devon Live reports: 

Why I changed my mind over Brexit - Sarah Wollaston

Voters were conned, says Totnes MP

10 COMMENTS

Keith Rossiter
20 AUG 2018

Voters were misled by deliberate untruths during the EU referendum and must be given a say on the final deal, Devon MP Sarah Wollaston says.

Dr Wollaston, who famously changed her mind during the 2016 campaign, has now become a leading campaigner opposing a “hard” Brexit.

“I was what you might call a soft Eurosceptic,” the Totnes MP said. “A lot of that was about the way the EU treated former Prime Minister David Cameron when he asked for fairly modest changes that would have been in the interests of the EU as well as the UK.

“During the campaign it became clear to me that there would be such huge unintended consequences as a result of us leaving.”



Totnes MP Sarah Wollaston

Dr Wollaston chairs the influential Commons Health Select Committee, and said she was persuaded by evidence from the life sciences industry and from patient groups about the scale of the impact on the health service.

But some voters were taken in by “frankly untrue” advertising by the Leave campaign – most notably the claim that Brexit would deliver a £350 million-a-week dividend to spend on the NHS. The Government has since made it clear that extra NHS spending will have to be paid for through higher taxes.

“I had people in the Leave campaign saying they knew it was wrong but it didn’t matter because using a big number would mean that people would just remember the big number,” Dr Wollaston said. “And the more people disputed it, all that would happen would be that more people would remember the big number.”

Afterwards, surveys showed that the single biggest thing the pubic recalled, it was the £350 million for the NHS, “even though the Leave campaign knew it was false. It was quite deliberate targeting, disinformation from people who should have known better. We now know there won’t be a Brexit dividend for the NHS – there will be a Brexit penalty.”


The EU referendum Leave campaign bus in Cornwall in 2016

The Leave campaign also played on fears of immigration – even after the murder of Yorkshire MP Jo Cox a week before the referendum by Thomas Mair, who had links to right-wing political groups.

“If you look at the targeted Facebook ads sent out immediately after the murder, I think anyone would feel that was distasteful,” Dr Wollaston says. “They were deliberately playing on people’s fears of mass immigration from the Middle East via Turkey.”

One Leave campaign ad suggested that Turkey was about to join the EU with an image showing a large red arrow sweeping across Europe from the Middle East to Britain. 
Ironically, leading Leave campaigner Boris Johnson has Turkish ancestry and, three months after the referendum, when he was Foreign Secretary, announced that Britain would support Turkey's bid to join the EU – a move opposed by most EU member countries.

“The Trumpification of our politics is very worrying. Playing to people’s fears and whipping those up has consequences. I have seen the impact of a very negative, xenophobic campaign in my surgeries. People from EU countries no longer feel welcome here.

“There is nothing sadder than meeting nurses from EU countries who have worked here for years and they are in tears because they feel no longer welcome. There has been a collapse in applications from EU nurses to work in the NHS.”


Brexit sceptics call for a people's vote

Dr Wollaston is backing a “people’s vote” so the public can give their “informed consent”.

“Everybody knew what ‘In’ meant, but nobody knew what ‘Out’ meant,” she said. “It looks as though we are heading towards the cliff and no deal, which would be the most harmful of all the options.

“It would be a bit like asking someone to consent to an operation two years in advance without them knowing whether they will have two toes removed or their whole leg.

“People have a right to make risky decisions if they feel that the outcome of the surgery is going to be better for them in the long run. That’s an important principle of medicine. But if people don’t know what the actual form of Brexit will be it’s very difficult for them to weigh up all the risks and benefits.

“I don’t think we have anything to fear from a second referendum now. It’s not about blocking Brexit; it’s about saying to people: I think you have the right to give informed consent now that we are very close to the final point and we’ve given a chance for negotiations to take place.

“Polls say there’s a very clear demand from people to have a final say. 
Everybody has the right to change their minds. Brexiteers have nothing to fear if they are confident of their position.”

She said the parliamentary European Research Group, headed up by hardliner Jacob Rees-Mogg, tabled two amendments specifically aimed at scuppering Theresa May’s so-called Chequers deal, the closest Britain has come to an agreed negotiating position.

“So we are sleepwalking towards the edge of a cliff and we might find ourselves crashing out by accident. It might not be what anyone wants.”

“Unfortunately the promises made during the referendum campaign that we would have bespoke deal look increasingly unlikely.

“There is time to pause once we know what the final terms are and check with the public that we have their consent. This is the biggest constitutional change in my lifetime. It isn’t right that we proceed without informed consent.”

She said it would be anti-democratic not to ask people for informed consent. Voters have the right to say the potential benefits outweigh the risks – or to say, “I don’t feel the benefits outweigh the risks and I would rather stay as we are.”

“Sometimes there’s a view expressed that the 48% who voted Remain should not have any say at all. I hear things like, ‘You lost, get over it’,” Dr Wollaston said. “I don’t agree with that. Everyone should have a say.

“If you take the 48% who voted Remain, and add a significant number of ‘soft’ Leavers who actually wanted to continue to have significant links with the EU. A lot of people talked to me about wanting to be in a single market. They just didn’t want the political union.

“Some people say to me, ‘I voted to get out immediately, get out completely’. I accept that there are some people who would like to see us leave with no transition and no deal, but I don’t believe they are in the majority.”

She said much would depend on what happens at the Labour Party conference in the autumn. “If Jeremy Corbyn backs the people’s vote campaign, there will be a majority in Parliament. Corbyn has managed to present an image to young people that he is on their side. I would like to see him supporting that with his vote.

“There are a great many Conservatives who are opposed to a walk-away Brexit. They need to be prepared to say so in public. Should any Government knowingly lead us into an extended period of economic pain and discomfort without knowing they have the consent of the public?”

The Brexit hardliner and North Somerset MP Jacob Rees-Mogg said last month: “We won’t know the full economic consequences for a very long time. The overwhelming opportunity for Brexit is over the next 50 years.” Dr Wollaston said: “I won’t be around then. We are not talking about a few weeks of turbulence.”


First set of A400M wings, produced by Airbus UK at Filton, being loaded onto the Airbus A300-600ST super transporter aircraft, known as the Beluga, for onward transportation to the A400M final assembly line in Seville, Spain.

She warned that the impact goes beyond the NHS.

“We have all become very used to the fact that we can travel in Europe without worrying about health insurance. If we leave on March 29 next year – particularly if there’s no ongoing cooperation arrangements – people with pre-existing medical conditions will find it much more difficult, and some of them will find themselves uninsurable, as they would be now if they wanted to travel to the United States.”

Big corporations such as Airbus have made it clear that Brexit will have a damaging impact. But small businesses in Dr Wollaston’s constituency – including the region’s many language schools, and the local residents who provide accommodation for European students – also expect to feel the pinch.

Dr Wollaston warned that the South West’s big fishing industry could also suffer, in spite of the enthusiasm among fishermen for being free of the Common Fisheries Policy.

“A significant amount of their exports go to the EU, and if they have long delays at borders that will be harmed. We have already seen the fishermen’s interests traded away in the proposed transition arrangements and there’s a lot of uncertainty about whether that will happen again.”


Fishing boats in Brixham harbour (Image: Keith Rossiter)

“If you look at just the cost of contingency plans for the NHS. We’re already hearing about the need for stockpiling – and that’s for drugs that can be stockpiled. Some need refrigerating to be stored. This is very expensive. The costs of drugs to the NHS will rise significantly.

She said it became clear that the entire NHS supply chain was at risk, and not just for medicines, but for medical devices and products such as blood plasma, which is imported from the EU. Every year 700,000 tests are carried out using radioactive isotopes, none of them made in the UK.

“We don’t make a single drop of insulin for diabetics in Britain. The cost of preparing for Brexit in terms of infrastructure at our borders is enormous. I don’t think at the moment people have been fully informed about the extra costs.

“Two years from now, if we have no deal and people come to my surgery unable to access some medicines they rely on, I want to be able to look them in the eye and tell them I did my best to ensure that we had a people’s vote.”

Dr Wollaston said the Remain campaign did not do enough to promote the positive side of the EU. Many people who remembered war in Europe – like her 83-year-old father – see the benefits of peace the EU has brought to the Continent.


Second World War graves at Higher Cemetery, Exeter (Image: Ed Oldfield)

“Many people are becoming aware of the positive case for Europe – in particular for young people and their ability to travel and work freely, which I think would be a great loss. But we went up against a campaign that was able to draw on many of the tactics used by the Trump campaign that was appealing to people’s fears.

“Some of the Remain campaign material was over the top as well. It allowed them to be written off as ‘project fear’. But I think some of that will turn out to be true if we have a hard Brexit.

“But I get very cross with people who say Leave voters were stupid. You don’t change people’s hearts and minds by telling them they are stupid. People voted the way they did for a variety of reasons.”

“We need to take account of people’s views about the impact of immigration.

“People say to me, ‘We haven’t seen rising unemployment’. But we haven’t left yet. But what we have already seen is the impact on our currency, and people will notice that when they go on holiday. And it got considerably worse this week as fears of a no-deal Brexit rose.”

“People have made a fuss about the EU being unhelpful. But their point would be that if you are 27 remaining members of the club and the 28 decides to leave, it doesn’t place an obligation on you to change your rules.

“The irony of all this is that just as we leave they may change their rules on immigration, which was a key driver of the Leave vote.”

Dr Wollaston said Theresa May was very likely to face a Right-wing challenge to her leadership this autumn, and her parliamentary colleague Dominic Grieve has said he would not remain as a Conservative MP if Boris Johnson becomes Prime Minister. But Dr Wollaston said: “There’s not a vacancy.

“The threat to the Prime Minister isn’t from people like me. It has always come from the Right-wingers in the ERG, who are constantly threatening to send their letters in to the 1922 Committee. I’m surprised to hear people saying I’m being disloyal. I’m not at all. It’s really regrettable that they [the Right-wingers in the party] continue to do this. The ERG should stop undermining the prospects of reaching a negotiated settlement.”

Dr Wollaston spoke at last weekend’s rally in Bristol to call for a People's Vote. “I hope people will sign the petition at www.peoples-vote.uk,” she said. “I sense very strongly that the public mood is changing as people see just how much they will lose. A feeling that they weren’t given all the facts. People have a right to change their mind, just as I did.

Wednesday, 8 August 2018

Brexit: and Exeter's MP demanding "the police rigorously and fully investigate these allegations"

Ben Bradshaw has been pushing for a complete look into the Brexit campaign for some time now:
Futures Forum: Brexit: and Exeter's MP asking for 'a full police inquiry'

One of the biggest issues is that of where the money came from to finance the campaign:#
Futures Forum: Brexit: and dark money

The Exeter MP has organised a letter from fellow MPs, as reported in the Independent this week: 

50 MPs and peers write to crime agencies demanding investigation into Vote Leave

Cross-party group urges police and National Crime Agency to fulfil role in 'protecting our democracy' after election watchdog finds laws were breached during 2016 referendum


Benjamin Kentish Political Correspondent

2 days ago


More than 50 MPs and peers from across the main political parties have written to the Metropolitan Police and the National Crime Agency asking them to investigate unlawful activities committed by the Vote Leave and Leave.EU campaigns. The group demanded thorough investigations into Electoral Commission findings that pro-Brexit campaigners breached spending rules, saying it was vital to “the integrity and security of our electoral system and democracy”.

Several Conservatives signed the letter, including Sarah Wollaston, the chair of the Commons health committee, and peers Baroness Altmann and Baroness Wheatcroft. Senior Labour and SNP MPs, and Liberal Democrats including party leader Sir Vince Cable, were also among the signatories. 


READ MORE
Vote Leave chief leaks ‘fake news’ report on misuse of data


They urged law enforcement agencies to investigate the Brexit campaigns’ “law-breaking”.

In their letter, the group said: “The Electoral Commission, the Information Commissioner, the House of Commons digital, culture, media and sport committee and others have been doing and continue to do important work in this area. However, their powers of investigation and the sanctions at their disposal are limited and they have no power to prosecute. This places a particular responsibility on those who do.”

Ben Bradshaw MP, a former Labour cabinet minister who helped organise the letter, told The Observer: “There has been no bigger decision – beyond questions of war and peace – before the British people in the last half century. The importance of the question demanded that both the spirit and the letter of the law were respected.

“But we know that Leave did neither and have been fined by the Electoral Commission, and leading figures have been referred to the police. They ran a campaign that was so bent they probably discussed whether they could pay for their dubious and disgusting Facebook ads with £9 notes.

“Threatening the integrity of the electoral system is surely one of the highest crimes in any democracy. It is essential that the police rigorously and fully investigate these allegations. These are not minor questions of missed deadlines, wrongly ticked boxes or badly filed invoices, but matters of the gravest importance.”


50 MPs and peers write to crime agencies demanding investigation into Vote Leave | The Independent

The Express is also following the story: 

'UK needs a Robert Mueller inquiry!' - MP DEMANDS probe on Russia meddling in Brexit vote

LEADING Conservative MP Damien Collins has issued a dramatic call for a police investigation into allegations of Russia interference during the Brexit campaign, demanding an inquiry like that led by Robert Mueller in the US.

By JAMES BICKERTON
PUBLISHED: 00:02, Sat, Aug 4, 2018 

.

Mr Collins, who chairs a powerful House of Commons Committee, claims only the police can find out what happened in the run-up to the 2016 vote. The MP’s Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee has been conducting an investigation into “fake news” which includes looking at allegations of Russian meddling.

Referring to the Robert Mueller investigation in the US he said: “I think we do need a British Mueller. We have been operating at the limits of our powers in this inquiry. We do not have the power that Mueller has to demand to see bank records, private papers and other things.”

Mr Collins suggested the investigation should be led by the National Crime Agency.

Key Brexit campaigners have been refusing to cooperate with the inquiry Mr Collins is leading. Dominic Cummings, formerly the director of the Vote Leave campaign and widely regarded as the brains behind Brexit, has refused to appear.

In June he accused the committee of “grandstanding” and spreading “fake news”. He added: “I will not come to your committee regardless of how many letters you send or whether you send characters in fancy dress to hand me papers. If another committee behaves reasonably and I can give evidence without compromising various legal actions, then I will consider it.”

Businessman Arron Banks, a former UKIP donor who spent £12million pushing Brexit, did appear before the committee but then walked out in protest.

During an interview with The Times, Mr Collins claimed top tech firms aren’t doing enough to “help us find suspicious accounts” on social media. He added: “There is every chance these Russian networks are far more widespread than we realise and potentially far more influential.”

Last year Joan Hoey, head of the Economist Intelligence Unit’s Europe Team, said allegations of Russian interference were being used as “an excuse” by Remain supporters and also accused the EU of “meddling in elections”.



Brexit News: Russia hacking EU referendum claims need Mueller style inquiry says Collins | UK | News | Express.co.uk
.
.
.