... A FORUM TO STIMULATE DEBATE ... ... JUST ADD A COMMENT AT ANY ENTRY BELOW... ... FOR THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TOWN AND VALLEY ...
Showing posts with label alternative technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label alternative technology. Show all posts

Thursday, 16 May 2019

Biosolar panels

An interesting technology has been developed:
First bio-solar panel to run on bacteria creates clean and sustainable energy - YouTube

This has been developed even further: 

These “biosolar panels” suck CO2 from the air to grow edible algae

05.01.19
WORLD CHANGING IDEAS

In London, scientists are testing the “BioSolar Leaf,” which uses carbon-hungry organisms to help clean the air better than trees can

– all while providing an excellent source of protein.


BY ADELE PETERS

At Imperial College London’s new campus in West London, some rooftops will soon hold bright green “biosolar” panels covered with algae. The plants suck carbon dioxide out of the air and produce fresh oxygen at a rate 100 times faster than trees covering the same amount of land–and then the microscopic organisms can be harvested to be used in food.

“We call it a ‘BioSolar Leaf,'” says Julian Melchiorri, CEO of Arborea, the company that designed the new technology. “It uses solar energy, but instead of converting solar energy into electricity [like a solar panel], we convert solar energy into food.”

Melchiorri, who graduated from a joint masters program at Imperial College London and the Royal College of Art in 2014, is primarily focused on using the technology at a larger scale to produce ingredients. It’s a way to produce more protein in a given area than any other type of food production; the algae are also a source of antioxidants and other nutrients. In pasta, for example, the algae can be used to add protein. The algae can also create natural food coloring. “Let’s say you have blue M&Ms,” he says. “The blue [algae], instead of being synthetic and having all of the issues related to colorants, actually has more antioxidants than you can find in an apple.”

Microalgae are already used in food, but the new panels use a proprietary production process that makes growing them less expensive, more scalable, and results in a higher quality product, Melchiorri says. “We reinvented how we can grow cells by radically changing culturing techniques,” he says. The company, which recently launched a Series A round of financing, plans to soon open a demo plant in San Diego. But Imperial College London saw an opportunity to pilot a rooftop system that would take advantage of the algae’s ability to clean the air.

“Our new campus is a brownfield site, and that means that it’s going to be difficult to grow trees to green it,” says Neil Alford, associate provost at Imperial College London. “But what we can do is use this technology to supplant the trees. We’ll have the ability to create oxygen within London, which isn’t a bad idea, but we can do something which per area will produce maybe 100 times more oxygen than trees will.” Algae naturally absorb CO2 and release oxygen faster than other photosynthetic organisms, and the panel growing system makes it possible to perform this process anywhere. “You can put them on the sides of buildings or the roofs of buildings, and that is something that is interesting for us.”

A city could potentially have a network of sites with the biosolar panels, beginning on buildings with sprawling roofs, such as supermarkets or warehouses, or next to industrial plants emitting carbon dioxide. The pilot plant at Imperial College London, which is now under construction, will test how well the system works to clean the air. Arborea will also continue to move forward with the panels at larger production plants. Because the panels can be used on infertile land, the process can avoid some of the sustainability challenges inherent in other food production–like the deforestation often caused when land is cleared to raise cattle or grow soy. The climate pollution avoided by producing protein with algae is even more significant than the algae’s ability to suck CO2 from the air, Melchiorri says. “[Our] primary function is to produce the most sustainable protein.”

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Adele Peters is a staff writer at Fast Company who focuses on solutions to some of the world's largest problems, from climate change to homelessness. Previously, she worked with GOOD, BioLite, and the Sustainable Products and Solutions program at UC Berkeley.


More


These "biosolar panels" suck up CO2 to grow edible algae
F&FF - Technical and Business Information
.
.
.

Saturday, 11 May 2019

Climate change: Are proposals to repair the climate offering "scalable technological fixes" or "climate despair"?

Should we be trying to 'fix' the climate?
Futures Forum: Climate change: the 'Big Fix': geoengineering solutions
Futures Forum: The techno-fix ... Can we engineer our way out of environmental catastrophe?

Especially with the idea of 'CCS'?
Futures Forum: Carbon capture > technological fix or false hope?
Futures Forum: Climate change and carbon capture: turning air into fuel by extracting CO2
Futures Forum: Climate change: will Carbon Capture and Storage be the techno-fix to 'unlock' unburnable fossil fuels?

Or not?
Futures Forum: Climate change >>> Engineering the climate >>> 'As a technology of last resort, carbon removal is paradoxical. It may be impossible to manage and it may also be impossible to manage without.'
Futures Forum: Climate change: and geoengineering >>> "Climate Intervention Is Not a Replacement for Reducing Carbon Emissions"

Cambridge University has just set up its Centre For Climate Repair to consider the options:
Cambridge Centre for Climate Science

And they are looking at "scalable technological fixes" - as reported in the wider media:
Cambridge University sets up technology centre to tackle climate change - i news
Cambridge scientists are building a new research centre to develop radical ways to ‘save the Earth’ | Daily Mail Online
Climate change: Scientists test radical ways to fix Earth's climate - BBC News

Here's Sky News:


The tech media is of course very interested:

Scalable, low-cost technologies needed to repair climate, Cambridge professor suggests

Natasha Lomas@riptari / 1 day ago

Cambridge University has proposed setting up a research center tasked with coming up with scalable technological fixes for climate change.

The proposed Center for Climate Repair is being coordinated by David King, an emeritus professor in physical chemistry at the university and also the U.K. government’s former chief scientific adviser.
Speaking to the BBC this morning, King suggested the scale of the challenge now facing humanity to end greenhouse gas emissions is so pressing that radical options need to be considered and developed alongside efforts to shift societies to carbon neutral and shrink day to day emissions.

“What we do over the next 10 years will determine the future of humanity for the next 10,000 years. There is no major centre in the world that would be focused on this one big issue,” he told BBC News.

In an interview on the BBC Radio 4’s “Today” program, King said the center would need to focus on scalable, low-cost technologies that could be deployed to move the needle on the climate challenge.

Suggested ideas it could work to develop include geoengineering initiatives, such as spraying sea water into the air at the north and south poles to reflect sunlight away and refreeze them; using fertilizer to regreen portions of the deep ocean to promote plankton growth; and carbon capture and storage methods to suck up and sequester greenhouse gases so they can’t contribute to accelerating global warming.

Scalable, low-cost technologies needed to repair climate, Cambridge professor suggests | TechCrunch

Environmentalists are not so keen:
Welcome to the Centre For Climate Despair
.
.
.

Thursday, 9 May 2019

A solution to our housing problems: self-build, modular and community

Tonight saw the last episode of Grand Designs: The Street:
Grand Designs: The Street - All 4
Q&A with Kevin McCloud on Grand Designs: The Street - Grand Designs Magazine

There's been a lot of interest:
Grand Designs The Street: Do couple end up homeless in finale of 2019 show? | Express.co.uk
Definite heartbreak and financial ruin: is the dream of a Grand Designs self build really worth it?  | Daily Mail Online
Grand Designs: The Street six-part series ends with a challenging £280k Modular House — built in a factory in nine weeks and assembled on site | Homes and Property

Here's The Sun's take at the beginning of the series: 

COUNTRY STYLES 

Life on Grand Designs street where 10 families have built their own homes in £100k plot on ex-MoD land in UK first


The pioneering community spent between £60,000-£500,000 on their charismatic builds in a UK first

By Hana Carter
4th April 2019

NESTLED among trees and Oxfordshire greenery is a cluster of very unique homes, all built from scratch by a tiny community of creative self-builders. After a plot of ex-MoD land was put up for sale, ten families bought their own slice of the 188-acres for £100,000 to design their very own stunning build. Every single home is completely different on the brand new street with each one made from different materials and seemingly inspired by various eras and tastes.

The little community near Bicester Village, Oxfordshire will be Britain's largest self-build project, all starting and finishing at the same time. With each patch being sold by Cherwell District Council and they invited buyers to be as ambitious as they pleased when it came to deciding on how they were going to build their dream home. And they did just that, in fact, the residents of Graven Hill were so innovative that Channel 4's Grand Designs will be featuring them on tonight's episode.

Kevin McCloud, who visited a self-built town in Amsterdam in 2010 had been looking for a British counterpart ever since, so was elated when he discovered the commuter town adjacent to the A41. He said that constructing your own house means "you get a highly bespoke home that's suited to your needs and reflects who you are."

The homeowners on the street vary from age 24 to 72 and each spent between £60,000-£500,000 to build their stunning properties.

Lynn, 65, who originally lived in an 18th-century cottage in Northamptonshire, said she decided to apply for the scheme with her neighbours, Terry and Olwen. All three of them got their homes accepted and retired school teacher Lynn got to work on her clay tiled house. Her property is made from Siberian larch with an oast house-inspired roundel. Light spills into the rooms which are spacious and bright.

She told The Daily Telegraph: "Every day, I come down and can't stop smiling that this is where I live. I've wanted to build a forever home before someone puts me in one."

With rolling fields, nature all around and a safe community, what better place to bring up a child and for Blanka and Paul that couldn't be more true. They live in their eco home with their two kids, which worked out to be the cheapest on the street.

Prior to the build, they were renting a cottage nearby. If they were to buy something similar it would have cost them £700,000 - something the couple didn't want to part with. So they whimsically decided to build one themselves with a budget of just £60,000.

Paul, a human rights lawyer, said: "I just thought, 'how hard can it be to build a house?'"

Their home is built using Hempcrete, a biocomposite made from hemp hurds and lime - an environmentally friendly and cheap material. The couple ended up spending £300,000 on their home after admitting that they had massively under-budgeted. But their home was completed after Paul took a few courses and watched a load of YouTube tutorials.

In the next decade the spot of land is expected to house up to 1,900 homes which will all be variations on a short list of home blueprints.

Graven Hill managing director Karen Curtin said: "The opportunity to showcase the first 10 self-builders at Graven Hill on the national stage is a milestone not only for the development and its community but also for the future of UK house building. The series will give viewers an insight into a bold and unique type of housing project, which has the potential to revolutionise the way that people approach both choosing – or building – a new home, and the environmental challenges the UK currently faces."

It will also have a new primary school, village centre, supermarket, village green, pub and maybe even a gym. All the residents at Graven Hill are friends and have a tight-knit community and for Paul, his advice to those wanting to turn their hand to building is - "just go for it."

Grand Designs: The Street will air tonight at 9pm. 

"Britain is now on course to generate electricity with zero carbon by 2025"

National and County media have been reporting on a break-through moment:
British power grid notches up first week of coal-free operation | Carbon Brief
Britain's power grid notches up first coal-free week since Victorian times - Devon Live

CNN covers the story too: 

The UK just went one week without coal power for the first time in 137 years

By Gianluca Mezzofiore, CNN

Updated 1325 GMT (2125 HKT) May 9, 2019

(CNN)For the first time since 1882, when the first coal-fired power plant started running in the UK, the country has gone coal-free for a full week, according to the National Grid's Electricity System Operator (ESO). 
And Britain is now on course to generate electricity with zero carbon by 2025, the operator said.

The milestone was reached as the country's Environment Agency issued a stark warning about coastal communities under rising threat of floods due to climate change.

'New normal'?

The coal generator was off between around 1.30pm on May 1, 2019 and the same time on May 8, according to ESO.

"While this is the first time this has happened, I predict it will become the 'new normal,'" Fintan Slye, Director of ESO said in a statement. "As more and more renewables come onto our energy system, coal-free runs like this are going to be a regular occurrence. We believe that by 2025 we will be able to fully operate Great Britain's electricity system with zero carbon."

The landmark target of a week without coal was achieved thanks to a long-term strategy aimed at increasing the use of renewable energies, from offshore wind to domestic scale solar panels, Emma Pinchbeck, deputy CEO at RenewableUK, told CNN.

"Wind has become a mainstream power source for the UK, providing up to 35% of our electricity over the weekend. Renewables have been crucial to phasing out dirty coal," she said. "The coal phase out is just the beginning of a move away from fossil fuels to low carbon living, to avoid the enormous risks of climate disruption. Last week, the Committee on Climate Change said we can only achieve net-zero emissions with a massive increase in renewables."

Regulation and profitability have played a role: under European Emissions Performance standards, old plants would have had to fit expensive new kit by the end of this year, and the economic conditions for coal are poor, Pinchbeck said. Carbon pricing has also had an impact.

Then, there's the Climate Change Act. which mandated country a near zero carbon power sector by 2032, and which drove major investment in low carbon technologies such as renewables from 2008, she added. The UK government has also committed to phase out all coal plants by 2025.

ESO data from the coal-free week shows that renewables (wind, solar, hydro, and biomass) accounted for around 23% of the total power, with natural gas and nuclear providing 46% and 21%. 
That means coal has been displaced by renewables, not gas, Pinchbeck said, explaining that there was more current and planned investment in the former.

Threat to coastal communities

The news came as the Environment Agency's chairwoman Emma Howard Boyd warned that entire coastal communities might need help to move "out of harm's way in the longer term," as global temperatures rise by an expected 4 degrees Celsius (7.2 degrees Fahrenheit) by 2100.

"We can't win a war against water by building away climate change with infinitely high flood defenses," Boyd said in a statement, adding that £1 billion ($1.3 billion) a year needed to be invested in flood management to combat the emergency.

On May 2, the country's Committee on Climate Change (CCC) urged the government to cut its greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050. Currently the UK has a target of curbing greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by 2050, compared to 1990 levels. Emissions fell by 42% in 2016.

The CCC said the new target is "necessary, feasible and cost-effective." But it will require drastic action, including phasing out petrol and diesel vehicles completely by 2035, planting 30,000 hectares of trees each year and cutting beef, lamb and dairy consumption by 20% by 2050.

CNN's Isabelle Gerretsen contributed reporting


The UK just went one week without coal for the first time in 137 years. - CNN
.
.
.

Wednesday, 3 April 2019

Carbon capture > technological fix or false hope?

Is carbon capture and storage going to sort out climate change?
Futures Forum: Climate change: Bio-energy + carbon capture and storage

Futures Forum: Climate change >>> Engineering the climate >>> 'As a technology of last resort, carbon removal is paradoxical. It may be impossible to manage and it may also be impossible to manage without.'
Futures Forum: Climate change: will Carbon Capture and Storage be the techno-fix to 'unlock' unburnable fossil fuels?

It's certainly in the news of late:
Carbon Capture is a Policy Problem, Not a Technology Problem | WCAI
How Carbon Capture Tech Is Easing Industry’s Green Transition - Forbes

And one project is on the BBC tonight:

Climate change: 'Magic bullet' carbon solution takes big step


By Matt McGratEnvironment correspondent
3 April 2019




A technology that removes carbon dioxide from the air has received significant backing from major fossil fuel companies.

British Columbia-based Carbon Engineering has shown that it can extract CO2 in a cost-effective way. It has now been boosted by $68m in new investment from Chevron, Occidental and coal giant BHP.

But climate campaigners are worried that the technology will be used to extract even more oil.
 

The quest for technology for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from the air received significant scientific endorsement last year with the publication of the IPCC report on keeping the rise in global temperatures to 1.5C this century. In their "summary for policymakers", the scientists stated that: "All pathways that limit global warming to 1.5C with limited or no overshoot project the use of CDR ...over the 21st century."

Around the world, a number of companies are racing to develop the technology that can draw down carbon. Swiss company Climeworks is already capturing CO2 and using it to boost vegetable production.

Carbon Engineering says that its direct air capture (DAC) process is now able to capture the gas for under $100 a tonne.

Saturday, 30 March 2019

Cutting CO2 vs "Make Cars Great Again"

Can we have our cake and eat it - continue to drive freely whilst cutting down on our CO2 emissions?
Futures Forum: Cutting Exeter's car emissions by getting motorists to drive differently, by using technology >>> launch of "Breathe Exeter" Thursday 25th April

However, it is very difficult to square this particular circle, as demonstrated in a recent piece from Wired: 

GERMANY HAS PROVEN THE MODERN AUTOMOBILE MUST DIE

This story originally appeared on The New Republic and is part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

AUTHOR: EMILY ATKIN

08.21.18

Germany was supposed to be a model for solving global warming. In 2007, the country’s government announced that it would reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent by the year 2020. This was the kind of bold, aggressive climate goal scientists said was needed in all developed countries. If Germany could do it, it would prove the target possible.

So far, Germany has reduced its greenhouse gas emissions by 27.7 percent—an astonishing achievement for a developed country with a highly developed manufacturing sector. But with a little more than a year left to go, despite dedicating $580 billion toward a low-carbon energy system, the country “is likely to fall short of its goals for reducing harmful carbon-dioxide emissions,” Bloomberg News reported on Wednesday. And the reason for that may come down not to any elaborate solar industry plans, but something much simpler: cars.

“At the time they set their goals, they were very ambitious,” Patricia Espinosa, the United Nations’ top climate change official, told Bloomberg. “What happened was that the industry—particularly the car industry—didn’t come along.”

Changing the way we power our homes and businesses is certainly important. But as Germany’s shortfall shows, the only way to achieve these necessary, aggressive emissions reductions to combat global warming is to overhaul the gas-powered automobile and the culture that surrounds it. The only question left is how to do it.

In 2010, a NASA study declared that automobiles were officially the largest net contributor of climate change pollution in the world. “Cars, buses, and trucks release pollutants and greenhouse gases that promote warming, while emitting few aerosols that counteract it,” the study read. “In contrast, the industrial and power sectors release many of the same gases—with a larger contribution to [warming]—but they also emit sulfates and other aerosols that cause cooling by reflecting light and altering clouds.”

In other words, the power generation sector may have emitted the most greenhouse gases in total. But it also released so many sulfates and cooling aerosols that the net impact was less than the automobile industry, according to NASA.

Since then, developed countries have cut back on those cooling aerosols for the purpose of countering regular air pollution, which has likely increased the net climate pollution of the power generation industry. But according to the Union of Concerned Scientists, “collectively, cars and trucks account for nearly one-fifth of all U.S. emissions,” while “in total, the US transportation sector—which includes cars, trucks, planes, trains, ships, and freight—produces nearly thirty percent of all US global warming emissions ... .”

In fact, transportation is now the largest source of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States—and it has been for two years, according to an analysis from the Rhodium Group.

There’s a similar pattern happening in Germany. Last year, the country’s greenhouse gas emissions decreased as a whole, “largely thanks to the closure of coal-fired power plants,” according to Reuters. Meanwhile, the transportation industry’s emissions increased by 2.3 percent, “as car ownership expanded and the booming economy meant more heavy vehicles were on the road.” Germany’s transportation sector remains the nation’s second largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, but if these trends continue, it will soon become the first.

Clearly, the power generation industry is changing its ways. So why aren’t carmakers following suit?

TO AMERICAN EYES, Germany may look like a public transit paradise. But the country also has a flourishing car culture that began over a hundred years ago and has only grown since then.

Behind Japan and the United States, Germany is the third-largest automobile manufacturer in the world—home to BMW, Audi, Mercedes Benz, and Volkswagen. These brands, and the economic prosperity they’ve brought to the country, shape Germany’s cultural and political identities. “There is no other industry as important,” Arndt Ellinghorst, the chief of Global Automotive Research at Evercore, told CNN.

A similar phenomenon exists in the United States, where gas-guzzlers symbolize nearly every cliche point of American pride: affluence, capability for individual expression, and personal freedoms. Freedom, in particular, “is not a selling point to be easily dismissed,” Edward Humes wrote in The Atlantic in 2016. “This trusty conveyance, always there, always ready, on no schedule but its owner’s. Buses can’t do that. Trains can’t do that. Even Uber makes riders wait.”

It’s this cultural love of cars—and the political influence of the automotive industry—that has so far prevented the public pressure necessary to provoke widespread change in many developed nations. But say those barriers didn’t exist. How could developed countries tweak their automobile policies to solve climate change?

For Germany to meet emissions targets, “half of the people who now use their cars alone would have to switch to bicycles, public transport, or ride-sharing,” Heinrich Strößenreuther, a Berlin-based consultant for mobility strategies told YaleEnvironment360's Christian Schwägerl last fall. That would require drastic policies, like having local governments ban high-emitting cars in populated places like cities. (In fact, Germany’s car capital, Stuttgart, is considering it.) It would also require large-scale government investments in public transportation infrastructure: “A new transport system that connects bicycles, buses, trains, and shared cars, all controlled by digital platforms that allow users to move from A to B in the fastest and cheapest way—but without their own car,” Schwägerl said.

One could get away with more modest infrastructure investments if governments required carmakers to make their vehicle fleets more fuel-efficient, thereby burning less petroleum. The problem is that most automakers seek to meet those requirements by developing electric cars. If those cars are charged with electricity from a coal-fired power plant, they create “more emissions than a car that burns petrol,” energy storage expert Dénes Csala pointed out last year. “For such a switch to actually reduce net emissions, the electricity that powers those cars must be renewable.”

The most effective solution would be to combine these policies. Governments would require drastic improvements in fuel efficiency for gas-powered vehicles, while investing in renewable-powered electric car infrastructure. At the same time, cities would overhaul their public transportation systems, adding more bikes, trains, buses and ride-shares. Fewer people would own cars.

At one point, the U.S. was well on its way toward some of these changes. In 2012, President Barack Obama’s administration implemented regulations requiring automakers to nearly double the fuel economy of passenger vehicles by the year 2025. But the Trump administration announced a rollback of those regulations earlier this month. Their intention, they said, is to “Make Cars Great Again.”

The modern cars they’re seeking to preserve, and the way we use them, are far from great. Of course, there’s the climate impact—the trillions in expected economic damage from extreme weather and sea-level rise caused in part by our tailpipes. But 53,000 Americans also die prematurely from vehicle pollution each year, and accidents are among the leading causes of death in the United States. “If US roads were a war zone, they would be the most dangerous battlefield the American military has ever encountered,” Humes wrote. It’s getting more dangerous by the day.

Cutting Exeter's car emissions by getting motorists to drive differently, by using technology >>> launch of "Breathe Exeter" Thursday 25th April

Cars are one of the worse producers of CO2:
Transport becomes most polluting UK sector as greenhouse gas emissions drop overall | The Independent

And one way to reduce this is to at least make people aware - and quite drastically:
Futures Forum: Extinction Rebellion in Exeter tomorrow: 11am Saturday 30th March

There are ways to drive in a more 'eco-friendly' way, however:
11 ways to cut your driving emissions | RAC Drive

And there are also devices being introduced, to encourage 'smoother driving' - and so reduce emissions:
How it works | Lightfoot

It's being launched next month in Exeter:
Breathe Exeter Launch Tickets, Thu 25 Apr 2019 at 18:30 | Eventbrite

Here's part of a puff-piece on the Devon Live website - its claims rather at odds with the reality on the ground as demonstrated earlier today in Exeter. Still, maybe we can have our cake and eat it... 

Plans unveiled to make Exeter a global leader in cutting car emissions

Lightfoot is investing £500,000 in Breathe Exeter


Hannah Finch
28 MAR 2019

Ambitious plans to make Exeter a global leader in low vehicle emissions is set to be launched.

A new movement is being pioneered by connected car technology developer Lightfoot in a bid to slash vehicle emissions through the actions of drivers, rather than government policy.

The maker of the world’s first technology to reward better drivers is investing over £500,000 in Breathe Exeter, a radical new initiative, which aims to remove the equivalent of 1,000 cars’ worth of emissions from the city’s air by the end of the year, simply by changing the way motorists drive.

With one month to go until the initiative is officially launched, Lightfoot has detailed its plans to make Exeter a global leader in the reduction of vehicle emissions through Breathe Exeter.

It aims to build support from individuals, businesses and public sector bodies that wish to play their part in making Exeter a “cleaner, greener” city by the end of 2019.

To achieve its goal, Lightfoot, headquartered on the outskirts of Exeter, aims to install its in-car technology, often described as “the Fitbit for cars”, in at least 5,500 vehicles by the end of 2019. The device costs just £149.



The lightfoot device in action

Drivers installing Lightfoot can expect to save an average of £160 per year on their fuel bill, meaning the device more than pays for itself in fuel savings alone, if they reach Lightfoot’s ‘Elite Driver’ standard - requiring a Lightfoot score of 85% or above. At this point, fuel and emissions savings of up to 20% become possible.

Those reaching Elite Driver standard are also automatically entered into cash prize draws and can enter competitions to win the latest tech, exciting experiences, and luxury produce that reward their efforts to drive more efficiently. Lightfoot will soon be launching The Drivers’ Lottery, which will expand its prize offering significantly with many more rewards for better drivers.

Motorists maintaining Elite Driver status can also look forward to 20% off their car insurance, as well as hundreds of savings on the high street and via online retailers. Users have the potential to save and earn over £750 per year with the discounts and rewards attainable through Lightfoot.

Commenting on the countdown to Breathe Exeter, Mark Roberts, founder and CEO of Lightfoot, said: “Through Breathe, we aim to remove 550 tonnes of pollutants from our city’s air by the end of December. To do this, we need just 10% of the city’s cars and vans to install Lightfoot.

“Our aim is to work with the city’s many enlightened businesses and citizens to make this happen, creating a greener, safer, less polluted city for all – whether you drive or not.

“For those joining us on this journey, there is a huge opportunity to make a positive difference – to create a blueprint for other cities to follow, proving that a social movement for change can have a bigger, more immediate impact than slow-moving national policy. Together, we can dramatically cut CO2, NOx, and particulates through one simple action - smoother driving.”

Mark Roberts added: “Breathe Exeter marks the first step of what could be an international movement to instantly and permanently reduce pollution and emissions on the roads of our cities. This is an opportunity for drivers to take the lead; to make a difference through their own personal actions, and to benefit from rewards and savings in the process.

“We see this as the perfect social movement where everyone benefits – whether it’s a child in the playground or the tourist admiring Exeter Cathedral. This is community activism working for the good of everyone.

“In our eyes Breathe is a ‘now’ solution to the growing global issue of vehicle emissions. Achieve our goals in Exeter and we will set a precedent for others to follow around the globe.”

Lightfoot is available to purchase from Halfords at Rydon Lane, Exeter. Its high-tech analytics and configurable in-cab feedback enable users to maintain a driving style that keeps their engine in its ‘sweet spot’ – where it uses the least fuel, emits the least pollution, and is most efficient.

Lightfoot’s technology has been widely used in the fleet sector by household names including Virgin Media, Greencore, and South West Water. It has also been trialled by private motorists in Exeter over the past two years, enabling the company to refine its technology and rewards platform in readiness for Breathe Exeter. Lightfoot users typically see reductions in fuel costs by up to 20%, harmful emissions by 20%, at-fault accidents by up to 40%, and wear and tear costs by 45%.


Plans unveiled to make Exeter a global leader in cutting car emissions - Devon Live
.
.
.

Thursday, 14 March 2019

Artificial Intelligence on the farm > software, hydroponics and reducing costs

Hi-tech is coming to the farm:
Futures Forum: Vertical farming > "the most technically advanced indoor farm in the world" unveiled

And that is in the shape of AI:
Futures Forum: Artificial Intelligence on the farm >>> 'Though machines with AI are surprising in their adaptability and prospects for improvement, they still lack a very human factor..... common sense'

Here's the latest project - from California: 

Fully autonomous robot farm opens in the US

By Siobhán Dunphy - 10.10.2018




California-based company Iron Ox has just launched its first fully autonomous farm, run entirely by robots and artificial intelligence (AI). The agritech startup seems to have taken precision farming to a new level. According to Iron Ox, the farm can “grow 30 times more produce than traditional farms” owing to AI software, year-round hydroponic processes, and making more efficient use of space by moving plants around as they grow. The robot farm is the brainchild of co-founders Brandon Alexander and Jon Binney, both engineers.

Hydroponics is a method of growing plants without soil, instead, using mineral nutrient solutions in water. The technique has several advantages over traditional farming ― it uses less water, is completely sterile, and makes more efficient use of space. The downside is that hydroponic farms require more labour. Based on the rate of growth, each plant must be transferred one by one through a series of different growing vats. Within this farm, however, robots do all the heavy lifting. Although, humans are still responsible for seeding and some of the post-harvest processes such as packaging.

Iron Ox has two robotic systems: a 450-kg bot on wheels named Angus that moves seedlings around the warehouse in their hydroponic “grow modules” in which leafy greens and herbs are grown in individual pots and a robotic arm that picks up individual plants and moves them from module to module. The entire process is run by a cloud-based AI software, nicknamed “the Brain,” monitored by a team of plant scientists. The brain takes data from the robots and various sensors and promptly sends back instructions to the robots on which tasks to perform and when. It can also adjust the balance of gases and nutrients in each pot for optimal growing conditions.

The entire 186 meters-squared space houses 1.2 x 2.4 m of these grow modules. Since 2015, the farm has grown around 26,000 heads of lettuce, leafy greens, and herbs each year. Iron Ox will begin selling some of its produce to local restaurants and grocery stores later this year and plans to open additional farms around other cities in the US ― urban locations will reduce transportation times and costs. To reach this stage, the team at Iron Ox had to solve an enormous array of technical problems, and another ever-present stumbling block is cost.

The high-tech indoor farm will have to compete on price with modern outdoor farms that have spent decades optimising their farming practices and can produce huge amounts of produce at a relatively low cost. Jonathan Gill, co-founder an automated farming project in the UK, HandsFree Hectare, told The Verge, the reason only “minimal amounts” of the global agricultural industry have been automated to date is simply that it’s not “economically viable” to do so. At the moment, robots are just not good enough and human labour is much cheaper. He says, “It’s just not necessarily the most efficient method of growing food for the world.”

The agricultural industry faces a number of challenges including pressure to produce more crops to achieve global food security as well as labour shortages. Referring to these major issues facing agriculture at present, Alexander told the Guardian, “We need to do something drastic; we need to do something radical to fix this, not just make something 5% or 10% more efficient.”


F&FF - Technical and Business Information
Fully autonomous robot farm opens in the US | European Scientist
.
.
.

Saturday, 2 March 2019

Financing future energy capacity, including renewables > Parliamentary Committee launches inquiry and asks for evidence: "A bigger shift in our energy infrastructure to a low cost, low carbon energy system is necessary."

There are questions around nuclear energy in the UK:
Futures Forum: The weakening business case for nuclear energy
Futures Forum: Energy infrastructure @ Hinkely C >>> losing control and paying tithes to Direct Foreign Investors

And in parallel, there is more interest in renewables:
Futures Forum: Getting the government to adopt the Community Energy Manifesto
Futures Forum: Small-scale low-carbon generation reintroduced in the UK
Futures Forum: Climate change: the CPRE and renewable energy in Devon

Meanwhile, a parliamentary inquiry into the future of energy has been launched: 

MPs launch inquiry into government energy policy after nuclear setback

August Graham
Friday 1 March 2019 12:00am

MPs are set to review the government’s plans for Britain’s energy sector after a string of major projects were abandoned by international companies.

The Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy Committee said it would look into the government’s plans to see if they are fit for purpose.

It will examine if the country needs a new approach to speed up investment into low-carbon, low-cost energy and secure supplies in the long term.

The decision comes after Japanese firms Hitachi and Toshiba pulled out of the Wylfa and Moorside nuclear projects, dealing a serious blow to the government’s plans. The committee also said it will investigate concerns over foreign investors in British nuclear. This comes amid worries about Chinese involvement in major projects.

Committee chair Rachel Reeves said: “In the wake of investment decisions over nuclear plants at sites such as Moorside and Wylfa, a giant hole has developed in UK energy policy. With coal due to go off-line, and the prospects for nuclear looking unclear, the government needs to set out how it will create the right framework to encourage the investment needed to plug the gap.

“In this inquiry, we want to examine the government’s approach to creating the right conditions for investment to deliver the secure energy capacity to meet the nation’s needs. A bigger shift in our energy infrastructure to a low cost, low carbon energy system is necessary.

“As a committee, we will want to consider what more the government needs to do to attract greater investment into financing future energy capacity, including renewables.”


MPs launch inquiry into government energy policy after Hitachi and Toshiba abandon nuclear plants | City A.M.

As the East Devon Watch blog comments:

Owl says: Such a shame that our Local Enterprise Partnership – dominated by people with a vested interest in the nuclear industry – has put all our growth and regional investment eggs in the Hinkley C basket!

“MPs are set to review the government’s plans for Britain’s energy sector after a string of major projects were abandoned by international companies” | East Devon Watch

See also:
Futures Forum: Is the Heart of the SW Local Enterprise Partnership delivering value for money? "Its below average performance - from unlocking investment to falling productivity - surely can only be seen as a failure?"

Here's what the Committee has to say on the future of energy: 

Committee explore finance and investment in UK’s future energy infrastructure

28 February 2019

The Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee has today launched an inquiry to examine the outlook for future investment in energy infrastructure in the UK. The Committee will be looking at whether the Government needs a new approach to bring forward investment to deliver a low carbon, low cost energy system and secure energy supplies for the long term.

Inquiry: Financial energy infrastructure
Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee


Purpose of the inquiry

The Committee’s inquiry is launched in the wake of recent decisions by Hitachi and Toshiba to halt new nuclear projects at Wylfa and Moorside and concerns over how the UK’s ‘nuclear gap’ for low carbon electricity can be filled. The inquiry will examine the challenges to raising finance in clean energy technologies such as renewables and storage. As part of its look at the Government’s approach to attracting investment in energy, it is also likely to look at the potential future financing of nuclear power, and concerns around foreign investors in this technology.

Chair's comments

Rachel Reeves MP, Chair of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee said:

"In the wake of investment decisions over nuclear plants at sites such as Moorside and Wylfa, a giant hole has developed in UK energy policy. With coal due to go off-line, and the prospects for nuclear looking unclear, the Government needs to set out how it will create the right framework to encourage the investment needed to plug the gap. In this inquiry, we want to examine the Government’s approach to creating the right conditions for investment to deliver the secure energy capacity to meet the nation’s needs. A bigger shift in our energy infrastructure to a low cost, low carbon energy system is necessary. As a Committee, we will want to consider what more the Government needs to do to attract greater investment into financing future energy capacity, including renewables."

Send in your views

Evidence is invited on potential investment across the energy sector, including power plants, system flexibility, and heat decarbonisation.

The Committee is inviting written submissions on the following points:

  • How do recent investment decisions on nuclear and trends in low carbon investment affect the UK investment outlook for energy infrastructure? Is there a case for changing the Government’s current approach to delivering a low cost, low carbon energy system? How could the ‘nuclear gap’ be filled?
  • How attractive is the UK energy sector for investment compared to other countries? Are there particular technologies which are more – or less – attractive to investors under current arrangements?
  • How has Government policy improved the UK energy investment environment over the last three years? 
  • What types of investor can we expect to finance future UK energy infrastructure? What are their criteria for investment, including on risks and returns? Does it matter if investors for specific technologies are largely from overseas?
  • What role should the Government play in providing financial support and sharing risks for new energy infrastructure? Are existing financing mechanisms, notably the Contracts for Difference, fit for purpose? Are there any practical issues, or potential unintended consequences, that could affect the feasibility of implementing alternative support models (such as a Regulated Asset Base)?
  • What further steps should the Government take to increase investor confidence in the UK energy sector? 

The deadline for written submissions is 3 April 2019.

Monday, 25 February 2019

The future of diesel: “Are we all supposed to drive electric vehicles now?”

The car industry has been trying to green itself, but then back in September 2015, we had 'Dieselgate' erupt upon us:
Volkswagen emissions scandal - Wikipedia
"Dieselgate" - a timeline of Germany's car emissions fraud scandal | Clean Energy Wire

Which raised all sorts of other issues:
Futures Forum: VW... and making 'wholly opaque disposable vehicles' >>> rather than making vehicles which 'run for a long time and are easy to fix'
Futures Forum: The fall and rise of the Electric Vehicle ... and yet "the electricity power grid needed behind the recharging still uses fossil fuels."

Not least, a year ago when further manipulation of testing was uncovered:
Suppressed: rigged diesel tests on monkeys showed new cars more harmful than 20-year-old models - Telegraph 

10 Monkeys and a Beetle: Inside VW’s Campaign for ‘Clean Diesel’

By Jack Ewing
Jan. 25, 2018

FRANKFURT — In 2014, as evidence mounted about the harmful effects of diesel exhaust on human health, scientists in an Albuquerque laboratory conducted an unusual experiment: Ten monkeys squatted in airtight chambers, watching cartoons for entertainment as they inhaled fumes from a diesel Volkswagen Beetle.

German automakers had financed the experiment in an attempt to prove that diesel vehicles with the latest technology were cleaner than the smoky models of old. But the American scientists conducting the test were unaware of one critical fact: The Beetle provided by Volkswagen had been rigged to produce pollution levels that were far less harmful in the lab than they were on the road.

The results were being deliberately manipulated.


...

10 Monkeys and a Beetle: Inside VW’s Campaign for ‘Clean Diesel’ - The New York Times

And this week things continued to look bad for VW:

VW Dieselgate woes continue after German court decision

Federal court decision in favour of disgruntled customers means Volkswagen may have to compensate Europeans too


by Greg Kable
22 February 2019

The Volkswagen Group has been dealt a severe setback in its efforts to put a close to the diesel emissions scandal following a decision by Germany’s top court that may force it to compensate thousands of European customers.

In a surprise ruling handed down on Friday, Germany’s Federal Court of Justice rebuked VW Group arguments that the cheat software it fitted to various diesel models was legal under European Union law, and therefore resolved it of any responsibility to compensate customers.

The court, acting on a case originally set to be heard on February 27, 2019, but since withdrawn at the behest of the plaintiff, brought down its decision, classifying the cheat software as a “material defect”.

In a statement, the court said the Volkswagen Group was obliged to provide customers with a car free from defects.

The decision is thought to open new legal avenues to customers seeking to claim compensation on the basis that the car they were sold was not representative of that advertised. In certain cases, it may even force the Volkswagen Group to provide customers with a brand new car, even if the car in question has been superseded by a new model.


...

VW Dieselgate woes continue after German court decision | Autocar

And meanwhile, we have a parallel court case going on over the relaxation of emissions:
Brussels to appeal Dieselgate ruling - Financial Times
EU commission appeals Dieselgate ruling - EU Observer 

Finally, in the UK, diesel clearly doesn't have a future - although what future car technologies there will be is not clear:



Car industry: What's behind recent closures? - BBC News 

And in Germany, home of VW, there is a backlash: 

Yellow Vests hit German streets in pro-diesel protests - France 24 

WHILE THE WORLD GOES ELECTRIC, SOME GERMANS DESPERATELY FIGHT FOR THEIR DIESEL

“Are we all supposed to drive electric vehicles now?”


By Wolfgang Kerler Feb 22, 2019, 9:00am EST

Germany is divided about the future of its most important industry: while some automakers pursue electric vehicles, a noisy group of diesel-energy enthusiasts are expressing their frustration through protests. These have gone on every weekend so far this year, since the first on January 11th.

The first protest took place in Stuttgart — the hometown of Daimler, Bosch, and Porsche — and was organized by Ioannis Sakkaros, who works as a mechatronics technician for Porsche. Since then, hundreds of protesters wearing yellow vests have gathered each weekend to rally against court-mandated driving bans for older diesel cars. The bans were put in place in response to excessive air pollution.

At a rally on February 9th in Munich, where BMW’s headquarters is located, dozens of people chanted a pro-diesel rhyme together, and cheered on speakers who accused “eco-fascists” and “green ideologists” of wanting to destroy the car industry. A man earned applause from the crowd for calling electric vehicles “hazardous waste.”

“ARE WE ALL SUPPOSED TO DRIVE ELECTRIC VEHICLES NOW?”

The debate about the future of cars — diesel or electric — is emotional for many Germans, as the auto industry and its dependent companies employ 1.8 million people, hundreds of thousands of whom work directly with internal combustion engines. But new carbon emission limits and pending bans on diesel and gasoline cars in major markets threaten their livelihoods. German cars are big business, bringing in almost $500 billion annually. And a successful switch to electromobility will cost 114,000 jobs in Germany by 2035, according to predictions from the Institute for Employment Research. After all, electric motors require significantly fewer components and less maintenance than internal combustion engines — which means an annual economic loss that will grow to reach $22 billion in 2035.

“The diesel is only the beginning,” Michael Haberland, who organized the protest in Munich, tells The Verge. “The gasoline engine is next.” Haberland is president of Mobil in Deutschland, a motor club. He feels the European emission limits for air pollution, which are responsible for driving bans, are nonsense. “Are we all supposed to drive electric vehicles now?” he asks. “They just don’t work. The diesel engine, on the other hand, has been a success story for more than 125 years.”

Volkswagen, the largest car manufacturer in Germany (and the world), disagrees with Haberland’s assessment. Last December, VW’s strategy chief surprised the industry when he announced that the company’s final generation of combustion engines will be launched in 2026. After 2040, Volkswagen wants to only sell electric vehicles. Other German manufacturers have not yet presented a deadline for their final traditional engines, but BMW, Daimler, and Porsche are also starting an EV offensive with dozens of new models lined up, investments in battery factories, and the development of rapid charging stations.

But the car industry isn’t united — many managers, especially from the supply industry, share the skepticism of the protesters. More than half of Western European car managers expect electric mobility to fail, according to a 2018 survey by KPMG, a consulting company with significant car world expertise.


...

In the face of electric vehicles, some Germans fight for their diesel - The Verge

.
.
.

Thursday, 7 February 2019

Small-scale low-carbon generation reintroduced in the UK

There has been a lot of campaigning to encourage new solar panelling - and to encourage government support:
Support Solar — 10:10
Futures Forum: 'Daylight robbery' > how the government wants you to donate your solar power to the energy companies

It seems to have paid off:
A fair deal for solar: the government are listening — 10:10

Sustainable Crediton reports:

Government U Turn on Payments for Exported Renewable Energy


With the closure of the Feed-in tariff scheme for new installations of solar panels in March 2019, it was thought that future exports of electricity from new home installations from April 2019 would have to be provided free. However the Government have U-turned following fierce criticism and are now consulting on the Smart Export Guarantee. Under the Smart Export Guarantee (SEG), government would legislate for suppliers to remunerate small-scale low-carbon generators for the electricity they export to the grid..

new consultation has just been published which closes on the 5th March 2019..

Sustainable Crediton - Government U Turn on Payments for Exported Renewable Energy

This is the government's portal:
The future for small-scale low-carbon generation - GOV.UK

The industry has responded:
Export guarantee assessment suggests solar deployment impact to be minimal | Solar Power Portal
A new era or a mountain to climb? BEIS export guarantee receives mixed bag of responses | Solar Power Portal
Government resurrects renewable export tariff - Utility Week
UK unveils small-scale RE lifeline - reNews - Renewable Energy News
'New era' for UK solar, as government U-turn promises payments for exported renewable power - Business Green

Here are a couple of non-industry views:
Community Energy England raises concerns over new green energy supplier proposals - Co-operative News


Smart Export Guarantee a step towards smart energy market

Britain is still some years away from having a truly smart energy market despite the welcome introduction of a new scheme to reward homes and businesses that supply low carbon electricity they generate to the national grid, an expert has said.11 Jan 2019
Smart Export Guarantee a step towards smart energy market - Out-law
.
.
.