These are all local authority-led:
WHITLEY BAY, NORTHUMBERLAND:
Whitley Bay Central Lower Promenade | Facebook
CRANBROOK:
Member of Development Management Committee asks for inclusion of own site in Local Plan | East Devon Watch
eastdevon.gov.uk/planning-libraries/consultation-proposed-changes2015/7167-pcarter.pdf
EXMOUTH:
End is nigh for Exmouth businesses as plans unveiled for seafront transformation | Exeter Express and Echo
Revealed: Exmouth seaside businesses set to close this autumn due to redevelopment plans | Exeter Express and Echo
SEATON:
cirencester.pegasuspg.co.uk/intranet/UDDocs/Seaton Regeneration DAS.pdf
Pegasus Group Ltd | Home
'This town has been sold to Tesco' | Society | The Guardian
Tesco invades Seaton – closing the nursery and holiday village - Home News - UK - The Independent
www.seatondevtrust.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/2007-11-27-minutes.pdf
Sustainable Seaton – a Transition Town | Sharon Pavey
Seaton: Residents slam EDDC decision - News - Midweek Herald 2009
Stand Up For Seaton (SU4S) 2006
AXMINSTER:
91/P1220 | Redevelopment | The Harbour Axmouth Seaton Devon EX12 4AA
'Localism' implies that planning decisions be made as close to the 'end-user' as possible - but should that be the planning authority, or the 'local community':
Futures Forum: LOCALISM restated >>> "Power should be decentralised down to the lowest appropriate level - to councils, to community groups and to individual taxpayers"
The danger of assuming the local authority should initiate 'redevelopment' means that a) this saps initiative from the 'local community' and b) the 'redevelopment' becomes compromised:
Futures Forum: Crony capitalism and lemon socialism in East Devon........ The costs of "substantial growth and expanding business"
Transparency vs. Secrecy | East Devon Alliance
Futures Forum: East Devon Business Forum: "Something to think about for the next council."
There are particularly tricky issues over the slippery notion of 'viability:
The term 'viability' seems to allow local authorities and developers pretty much of a carte blanche - until other obligations are pointed out to them.
Futures Forum: When is a development 'viable' or not?
And if the public/planning authority owns the land to be 'redeveloped', there will be further conflicts of interest:
Futures Forum: Public Space
There are less heavy-handed approaches - which the local planning authority can embrace.
SIDMOUTH:
Futures Forum: Plans for Port Royal: mixed development
Futures Forum: Ham Lane Redevelopment Study - a mixed development for Port Royal
Futures Forum: Affordable housing in Sidmouth: DCH and EDDC
JURASSIC COAST:
Futures Forum: The Blue New Deal from the New Economics Foundation: 'delivering good jobs and economic sustainability for coastal communities through a healthier marine environment'
TOTNES:
Futures Forum: Totnes REconomy Project ... and Atmos Totnes
Futures Forum: The Atmos project: and community develpment in Totnes: the video
Futures Forum: Community build at Atmos, Totnes >>> 'You have to be brave, you have to have difficult conversations. But that means you will build the right thing'
In other words, 'redevelopment' does not have to be massive and grandiose to work:
Futures Forum: "Small plus small plus small equals big" >>> 'There is a blind spot about economic regeneration in most local authorities'
Certainly, in this part of the world at least, there is considerable pressure on the planning authority:
Futures Forum: 'Development resistance' in East Devon >>> or, how local issues might affect the general election >>>
See also:
Futures Forum: 'Save Exmouth Seafront' group launched >>> complete the survey by Saturday 5th September
Futures Forum: The future of Tesco's in East Devon - part two
Futures Forum: Knowle relocation project: "Rather than expensive vanity projects, they should stay in their old home in Sidmouth (even expensive to heat) and concentrate on spending our money more wisely."
Futures Forum: The District Council and the draft local plan... "We are working as hard as possible to complete the work."
.
.
.
And if the public/planning authority owns the land to be 'redeveloped', there will be further conflicts of interest:
Futures Forum: Public Space
There are less heavy-handed approaches - which the local planning authority can embrace.
SIDMOUTH:
Futures Forum: Plans for Port Royal: mixed development
Futures Forum: Ham Lane Redevelopment Study - a mixed development for Port Royal
Futures Forum: Affordable housing in Sidmouth: DCH and EDDC
JURASSIC COAST:
Futures Forum: The Blue New Deal from the New Economics Foundation: 'delivering good jobs and economic sustainability for coastal communities through a healthier marine environment'
TOTNES:
Futures Forum: Totnes REconomy Project ... and Atmos Totnes
Futures Forum: The Atmos project: and community develpment in Totnes: the video
Futures Forum: Community build at Atmos, Totnes >>> 'You have to be brave, you have to have difficult conversations. But that means you will build the right thing'
In other words, 'redevelopment' does not have to be massive and grandiose to work:
Futures Forum: "Small plus small plus small equals big" >>> 'There is a blind spot about economic regeneration in most local authorities'
Certainly, in this part of the world at least, there is considerable pressure on the planning authority:
Futures Forum: 'Development resistance' in East Devon >>> or, how local issues might affect the general election >>>
See also:
Futures Forum: 'Save Exmouth Seafront' group launched >>> complete the survey by Saturday 5th September
Futures Forum: The future of Tesco's in East Devon - part two
Futures Forum: Knowle relocation project: "Rather than expensive vanity projects, they should stay in their old home in Sidmouth (even expensive to heat) and concentrate on spending our money more wisely."
Futures Forum: The District Council and the draft local plan... "We are working as hard as possible to complete the work."
.
.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment