... A FORUM TO STIMULATE DEBATE ... ... JUST ADD A COMMENT AT ANY ENTRY BELOW... ... FOR THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TOWN AND VALLEY ...

Sunday, 10 March 2019

Knowle relocation project: how vulnerable is Honiton HQ builder? >>> "Interserve is likely to go into administration"

We might never know how much the new District Council HQ cost:
Futures Forum: Knowle relocation project: District Council rejects motion "for the ongoing costs to be published to show confidence that this project will breakeven"

There are all sorts of unofficial figures out there:
Futures Forum: Knowle relocation project: or, how a new HQ costing £8.7m is valued at £3.5m
Futures Forum: Knowle relocation project >>> >>> a spanking new HQ for £5.6 million... or for £10.6 million?

We do know that the builders of the new HQ are facing considerable difficulties:
Futures Forum: Knowle relocation project: how vulnerable is Honiton HQ builder? >>> and how 'financially stable'?

And it seems that they are reaching the end of the road - and as suggested by the East Devon Watch blog, this might pose problems for the District Council should anything further need doing to their new HQ: 

BETTER HOPE NEW EEDC HQ IS IN GOOD NICK …

10 MAR 2019


… as its builder is on the ropes and 45,000+ people could lose jobs. Unless we, the taxpayers, pick up the bill – again.


Better hope new EEDC HQ is in good nick … | East Devon Watch

Here's the full report from the BBC: 

Government outsourcing firm Interserve faces administration

Simon Jack
Business editor

10 March 2019

Interserve is likely to go into administration on Friday.

Directors of the company, that employs 45,000 people in the UK, have told the BBC the firm has "a mountain to climb" to prevent it collapsing under the weight of its nearly £650m in debt.

A plan to swap the majority of that debt for new shares requires the support of more than 50% of the shareholders and the company's biggest shareholder - US hedge fund Coltrane which owns 27% - is currently dead set against the plan. Since many small shareholders don't vote - even in a crisis like this - the support of Coltrane is seen as crucial in getting the deal through. The board's plan would see current shareholders awarded 5% of the company - with the rest going to the creditors.

It is tempting to see Interserve as the next Carillion. An-overly indebted private provider of public services going to the wall after years of suicide bidding to win government contracts at the same time as paying out big salaries and dividends. While there are similarities, there are important differences.

Piece-meal sale?

If the company collapses on Friday - this is what will happen.

Accountants EY will be appointed administrators, they will then sell the company for a nominal amount to the current lenders (a mixture of banks and bond holders) who will own 100% of the new company.

The board then expects those lenders to sell the business units off piece-meal. The board does not expect any interruption to the company's underlying contracts or any immediate job losses.

The real impact will be on the debate over the appropriateness of using big private sector contractors to carry out essential public service work.

Game of chicken?

The government has been monitoring the Interserve situation closely and while it has felt unable to award a company close to collapse much new work, the Cabinet Office and the Department for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy are comfortable services won't be interrupted.

In fact, Interserve - minus its crippling debts - will arguably be in one of the strongest financial positions of any outsourcer.

There may yet be a last-minute deal to save the company. It is after all a curious game of chicken. If Coltrane insists on blocking the deal - it will get zero rather than the teaspoon of value its being offered under the board's plan.

The biggest loser - apart from the shareholders - will be the reputation of an outsourcing business model that will doubtless once again become a political football.


Government outsourcing firm Interserve faces administration - BBC News
.
.
.

No comments: