... A FORUM TO STIMULATE DEBATE ... ... JUST ADD A COMMENT AT ANY ENTRY BELOW... ... FOR THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TOWN AND VALLEY ...

Saturday, 6 April 2019

Brexit: and Exeter's MP calling on the Electoral Commission to reopen its investigation

Regularly, on a monthly basis now, stories about the 'dark money' behind Brexit keep surfacing:
Futures Forum: Brexit: and the story of dark money ratcheting up
Futures Forum: Brexit: and spending yet more dark money

Over the last week, there have been further stories:
'Grassroots' Facebook Brexit ads secretly run by staff of Lynton Crosby firm | Politics | The Guardian
Two Secretive Campaigns Using Facebook To Push A Hard Brexit Are Facing Scrutiny By MPs - Buzzfeed
Hard Brexit, Dark Money: Links Between These Secretive, Big-Spending Groups Raise New Questions For Facebook About Political Campaigning - Buzzfeed

Ben Bradshaw, MP for Exeter, has been calling for investigations for some time now:
Futures Forum: Brexit: and Exeter's MP pressing for 'a full investigation'

And this week he's been pushing for more - as reported by OpenDemocracy: 

“Not in the public interest”: why the Electoral Commission didn’t investigate Vote Leave and DUP donation

The UK’s election watchdog doesn’t think it’s worth finding out if the Brexit campaign broke the law more than once. MPs have called on the regulator to look again.

Peter Geoghegan

Jenna Corderoy
1 April 2019

The Electoral Commission decided that “it would not be in the public interest to investigate” even if Vote Leave broke the law by coordinating with the Democratic Unionist Party during the 2016 Brexit referendum, new documents reveal.

The elections watchdog also said that money obtained from crime might not make a political donation unlawful. The comments were made following concerns raised in a BBC Northern Ireland documentary about a secretive £435,000 donation given to the DUP’s Brexit campaign.

Last week, Vote Leave dropped its appeal against the Electoral Commission’s ruling that it broke the law in a different way – by channelling hundreds of thousands of pounds of donations to BeLeave, another pro-Brexit campaign group. The official Vote Leave campaign, whose leaders included Boris Johnson and Michael Gove, has been fined multiple times and referred to the Metropolitan Police for breaking electoral law.

Internal documents prepared by the Electoral Commission after the BBC Northern Ireland documentary reveal little appetite to investigate potential Vote Leave coordination in the DUP’s referendum spending. As Vote Leave had already been fined for a breach of electoral law after giving money to BeLeave “it would not therefore be in the public interest to investigate even if there was evidence of an offence”, the regulator said.

The DUP received £435,000 from the Constitutional Research Council (CRC), a shadowy group led by Richard Cook, a former Tory candidate allegedly involved in illegal waste dumping. The ultimate source of the DUP’s Brexit cash has never been disclosed but much of it was spent with the same suppliers as Vote Leave, including an obscure Canadian data analytics firm.

Jolyon Maugham, the barrister behind the Good Law Project, said: “The Electoral Commission seems to think that because Vote Leave has been found guilty of one offence, legally it cannot be found guilty of another one. That is a profound misstatement of the law. And that’s bad enough. But even more troubling are its consequences.

“How many other times did the Electoral Commission fail to investigate because it didn’t think it was in the public interest for us to know? What else is out there that they wrongly closed their eyes to? How many other times did Vote Leave break the law?”

MPs have called on the Electoral Commission to look afresh at possible further breaches of electoral law by Vote Leave.

Labour MP Ben Bradshaw said: "I am extremely concerned that the Electoral Commission deemed it against the public interest to investigate this properly. It was the biggest donation in Northern Irish political history and we still do not know its true origins. Now that we know conclusively that Vote Leave broke the law by channelling money illegally to BeLeave, it is vital that the Commission reopens its investigation into this."

The elections watchdog has said that it was “not satisfied there is sufficient evidence for the Commission to have a reasonable suspicion that offences have taken place.”

The documents form part of the Good Law Project’s judicial review of the Electoral Commission’s investigation into the DUP. They also reveal that the party received more than £13,000 from the CRC after the Brexit vote, including £7,000 just days after the 2017 Stormont elections. In all, the CRC has given the DUP almost £450,000.

Working together?

In June 2018, BBC Northern Ireland’s Spotlight team aired a documentary that raised serious questions about whether Vote Leave and the DUP were ‘working together’, which is prohibited under electoral law. As openDemocracy has previously revealed, senior Electoral Commission staff at the time privately expressed ‘concerns’ that the DUP had broken the law, but decided not to investigate.

The bulk of the DUP’s massive Brexit donation was spent on a wraparound advert in the Metro newspaper just days before the European Union referendum. Spotlight journalists discovered that the advert, costing £282,000, had been booked directly by Richard Cook, not the DUP.

The Constitutional Research Council made a donation of £335,000 to the DUP on the very same day as the Metro advert was booked. Spotlight stated that the DUP’s Metro advert suggests coordination with Vote Leave because the ad was targeted “in London” and was published after “Vote Leave had reached its spending limit”.

In internal documents the Electoral Commission said that there were “a number of possible explanations for Mr Cook allegedly booking the DUP advert in the Metro”. Ignoring the Spotlight revelations, the elections regulator went on to say that it would not be “appropriate” to contact Metro to ask about the advert as “there is no evidence Mr Cook or the CRC directed or influenced the DUP’s spending, even [that] he had booked the ad”.

The Electoral Commission’s internal report noted that the CRC’s Richard Cook has had a chequered business history, including involvement in illegal waste and a questionable $80m contract to dispose of Ukrainian railway tracks that fitted the profile of money laundering. The watchdog said UK elections law “is silent on whether or not money obtained from crime would make a political contribution unlawful”.

The elections regulator also noted similarities in the DUP and Vote Leave’s spending. But again decided that there were no grounds to investigate.

The DUP bought Brexit election placards from a Cambridgeshire advertising company called Soopa Doopa. The company received combined spending from Leave campaigners of £800,000, the bulk of it coming from the official Vote Leave campaign.

The DUP also spent around £40,000 on social media with Aggregate IQ, an obscure Canadian data analytics company that has been linked to the controversial Cambridge Analytica. Vote Leave spent almost £3m with AIQ, much of it in the final days of the campaign.

AIQ’s chief Jeff Sylvester told Spotlight that his contact in the DUP was Belfast city councillor Lee Reynolds. Reynolds was seconded to Vote Leave Northern Ireland during the Brexit campaign.

The DUP went on to pay AggregateIQ £12,000 as part of its March 2017 Northern Ireland Assembly election campaign. Over £3,300 of this was paid to AggregateIQ for services provided to the campaigns of three DUP candidates, while a further £8,600 was paid for services provided to the party.

Around the same time, the CRC gave the DUP just over £13,000. The CRC, which has never revealed its donors, also gave £6,500 to the pro-Brexit European Research Group of MPs in December 2016.

‘Real question marks’

Reacting to openDemocracy’s story Liberal Democrat MP Tom Brake said: "I would expect Government Ministers involved in law-breaking Leave campaigns to claim it was 'not in the public's interest' to investigate further possible breaches of the law, but not the independent Electoral Commission! We need our regulator to adopt zero-tolerance towards electoral law-breaking. Any whiff of cheating in referenda or election campaigns damages our democracy.".

Jolyon Maugham called on the elections watchdog to re-examine spending by other pro-Brexit groups: “We already know the High Court has profound concerns about the Electoral Commission’s investigation into the DUP. It has said it is ‘inevitable’ the Electoral Commission will have to reopen its investigation following a Court of Appeal hearing in July. And there are real question marks about its investigation into the relationship between Vote Leave and Veterans for Britain.”

An Electoral Commission spokesperson said:

"We are an evidence-based regulator and undertake our work to the highest standards. In August 2018, we concluded an assessment into allegations of joint spending by Vote Leave and the DUP. We had requested further evidence from BBC Northern Ireland that first aired the allegations. No further evidence was forthcoming and there was insufficient evidence to open an investigation. This decision was taken in line with our Enforcement Policy."

Vote Leave was fined last year after the Electoral Commission concluded that it had broken legal spending limits by donating hundreds of thousands of pounds to another leave campaigner, the then 22-year-old fashion student Darren Grimes, founder of BeLeave.

Vote Leave appealed against the fine, claiming that its donation to Grimes had been signed off by the commission. Supporters of the group suggested, without evidence, that commission staff were opposed to leaving the EU and were persecuting Leave campaigners.

However, in a statement released on Friday afternoon, the Electoral Commission said Vote Leave had withdrawn its appeal. “We found that [Vote Leave] broke the electoral rules set out by parliament to ensure fairness, confidence and legitimacy at an electoral event,” it said.

Richard Cook has denied any wrongdoing in his business dealings or in relation to the DUP donation.

Cook told the Sunday Herald: “The CRC is regulated by the Electoral Commission. We operate solely in the UK. We accept donations only from eligible UK donors. We donate solely to permissible UK entities. Any suggestion that we have done anything else is basically defamatory. I’m not going to get into the donors, like I am not going to get into the members.”

The DUP has said the party has been “open and transparent” about the CRC donation.

A spokesman said: “The DUP is well aware of its responsibilities and has complied with the regulations as set out by the Electoral Commission. If we failed to comply we would be subject to further investigation.

“In the interests of transparency we have provided information into the public domain which we were not legally obliged to provide. There is no additional information provided to the Electoral Commission that we have failed to publish.”


“Not in the public interest”: why the Electoral Commission didn’t investigate Vote Leave and DUP donation | openDemocracy
.
.
.

Friday, 5 April 2019

“Devon’s New Housing Need - A Government and Local Authority Perspective” > Housing Minister addresses CPRE seminar in Exeter > full report

The Campaign to Protect Rural England put on a very well-attended conference last month:
Futures Forum: “Devon’s New Housing Need - A Government and Local Authority Perspective” > CPRE seminar in Exeter > video report
Futures Forum: “Devon’s New Housing Need - A Government and Local Authority Perspective” > Housing Minister to address CPRE seminar in Exeter > Thursday 21st March

Devon Live has an account of the Minister's speech at the event:

Minister urges developers to build beauty for Devon's new build estates

However, Kit Malthouse MP was criticised for not reading CPRE report on housing need


Lewis Clarke
4 APR 2019


.

CPRE KIT MALTHOUSE IN DEVON

Housing Minister Kit Malthouse has called on developers and local authorities to build beauty across the nation.

The MP spoke to the Devon branch of the CPRE (Campaign to Protect Rural England) at Sandy Park in Exeter on Thursday, March 21. The event was CPRE Devon’s biggest yet, drawing 230 people from across Devon as well as neighbouring counties.

Mr Malthouse MP discussed the Government’s target of building 300,000 new homes a year in England.

He said: “We promise to future generations that their lives will be better than ours, that we will start the businesses, find the cures, plant the trees and build the houses that mean future generations have a better life than we do.

“That’s fundamentally what binds us together and means my children – I own a 20-year-old and a couple of younger twins - will pay to look after me when I’m sick and elderly, and the deal is that I will provide for them in the future.


READ MORE
Villagers furious at plans to dump thousands of tonnes of soil at farmland near Exeter 


“We have to acknowledge that in the last 40 years a particular part of that contract, the housing part, has broken down. Governments of all stripes over the past three or four decades have failed to build the houses the country needs, and the crash in 2007 exacerbated that. Just before the crash, we built around 231,000 new homes in this country, after the crash that dropped down to about 124,000. That coincided with enormous changes in demographics, people living much longer, but also living alone much longer, younger people also living alone in single unit households and growing population alongside it as well. It meant that we saw some important indicators in this country start to fall, not least home ownership amongst the young.

“My predecessors and back in the days of the coalition decided that we needed to do something about this and to start to ramp up and push as hard as we could on the housing production numbers to try and restore people to where they were before. I’ve been given this enormous target or hitting 300,000 homes a year. I hope there is nobody who thinks we don’t need to build any more houses and I certainly hope nobody thinks we need to build new houses but just not in Devon.

“This is a national mission for all of us and a national obligation for all of us to the next generation.”

Mr Malthouse accepted that it was a “particularly difficult conundrum” to solve in the “beautiful” county of Devon but encouraged local debate to answer questions of how many, where and what type of housing was needed locally.



(Image: CPRE)

He added: “We are putting enormous emphasis on the desire for local authorities to think about beauty. If we’re going to get to 300,000, it is an enormous ramp up from where we are, and it means that hardly any part of the country that is untouched by development.

“In my experience 80 per cent of people’s concern about development is what it’s going to look like. The phrase I hear most from people is that it will spoil their area, and yet if we get design right, make it beautiful, and if it fits and takes part in the context of where it is place, it can enhance things.

“The charge I put down to the development community is twofold; I’ve said to them to think not just of building homes, but building neighbourhoods, and how they will live, the soul and the heart. Secondly, they need to consider if they are building the conservation area of the future. Is what they are building going to last the centuries or is it likely to bulldozed in the next forty years as so much of what was built in the 60s and 70s is now.


READ MORE
Housing minister to address special CPRE Devon seminar amidst growing concerns over the impact of new homes developments


“I hope that in four decades they will turn up with a preservation notice to the stuff we’re going to build rather than bulldoze them. I admit we’re not achieving that now, and the large builders are building the same thing whether it’s in Devon, Doncaster, Canterbury or Carlisle. It all looks the same, it doesn’t fit, they’re not using local vernacular, they’re not using detailing it’s all blank ubiquity.

“We won’t get to the 300,000 target because residents will be hostile to development, thinking it’s going to spoil areas. It’s critical that local authorities and developers make space for beauty. We’re trying hard to push the idea that if we’re building beautiful stuff, then we will be much more likely to make progress”.

However, the minister has been lambasted by Devon residents for not addressing concerns about the impact of new homes in the countryside.

CPRE Devon has produced a hard-hitting video in the wake of the Housing Minister’s address to a seminar in Exeter on the issue of the number of new homes in Devon’s countryside.


The local conservation charity is campaigning to protect Devon’s precious countryside and green spaces. Last year, it commissioned an independent report by a leading research company, which showed that more new homes are being built in Devon than are needed and that too few of them are affordable or sustainable.

The Minister was expected to respond to this evidence and people’s concerns about the scale, design and quality of new housing. In fact, he admitted on camera that he hadn’t even read the report, produced six months ago, before coming to Devon to deliver his keynote speech.

Many attendees said they were disappointed and frustrated by what they heard from the Minister, including his failure to address key concerns about the lack of investment in corresponding infrastructure such as transport links, employment, schools and health facilities.

Rebecca Bartleet, Chair of CPRE Devon said: “Kit Malthouse does not come out of this well. He failed to read our report in advance. So why come all this way on the pretence of answering the questions raised in the report?

“He did not come to hear our concerns, based on hard evidence. He came to peddle his policies and basically tell us we are wrong to disagree with them. By contrast, the presentation by Mid Devon District Council’s CEO, Stephen Wolford, added real substance to the new homes debate.”

READ MORE
Culm Valley Garden Village £300k cash boost welcomed


Penny Mills, Director of CPRE Devon, added: “We are grateful to the Minister for coming to Devon and to Sir Hugo Swire for arranging the visit. Our event was packed with over two hundred people interested to hear what Mr Malthouse had to say. Unfortunately, he neither addressed the key findings of our report nor the fact that the government has used an outdated and flawed methodology in calculating new housing figures. We will, therefore, be writing to Mr Malthouse with the questions people want answered. We will continue our campaign to challenge the number of homes the government claims need to be built in Devon and to protect Devon’s precious asset - its countryside.”

Six months after Opinion Research Services (ORS) published the report, DEVON HOUSING NEEDS EVIDENCE, Local Planning Authorities appear to be responding to pressure to take note of the evidence. East Devon District Council and Exeter City Council are commissioning their own studies to take a fresh look at the justification for continuing to build the number of new homes planned.

Latest figures released nationally by CPRE show how much brownfield land is available for development before more countryside is lost. The figures show that across Devon there are currently 337 brownfield sites, totalling over 400 hectares of available land with a minimum capacity of 14,405 homes.


Minister urges developers to build beauty for Devon's new build estates - Devon Live
.
.
.

Automation and the future of work > How secure are East Devon's new warehousing jobs?

The question disturbing a lot of policy-makers is to what extent robots will 'take over' the world of work:
Futures Forum: "AI will start creating more jobs than it destroys by 2020"
Futures Forum: Artificial Intelligence: how can technology help humanity?

One issue is how this will impact the low-wage economy.

This is from a posting from this blog from October: 

Power-relations and control > "Who will own the future?" > on Artificial Intelligence, Universal Basic Income and the potential threats from automation

The futures promised by AI are pretty wide-ranging:
Futures Forum: Artificial Intelligence: how can technology help humanity?
Futures Forum: Synthetic Biology’s “Project Fear”
Futures Forum: 2001: A Space Odyssey > the unfulfilled promises of science fiction
Futures Forum: Brexit: and robots looking after us in our old age
Futures Forum: Artificial Intelligence: is it humanity's greatest 'existential risk'?

One of the key issues is that of work:
Futures Forum: Creating/destroying jobs >>> Creative Destruction and Artificial Intelligence
Futures Forum: Artificial Intelligence: 'complements labor and increases its productivity'
Futures Forum: Technological unemployment and the Luddite fallacy

With the threat of us all losing our jobs comes the idea of the Universal Basic Income:
Futures Forum: Universal Basic Income: the libertarian argument for
Futures Forum: Universal Basic Income @ Radio 4's In Business


Futures Forum: Power-relations and control > "Who will own the future?" > on Artificial Intelligence, Universal Basic Income and the potential threats from automation

Because Exeter and East Devon councils have heavily invested in warehousing jobs:
Futures Forum: The promises from the Skypark 'business park' >>> "A multinational comes along and plonks itself just out of town. Hooray, they tell us... Jobs for all!"
Futures Forum: The Exeter Gateway intermodal logistics site ... "Sainsbury's confirms it will not progress with huge distribution centre near Exeter."
Futures Forum: Sidford business park >>> County Council's Highways objection to the plan focuses on the distribution element - and could ‘play straight into the developers hands’

But this is the future of warehousing - in China - with not a soul in sight:



JD.com Fully Automated Warehouse in Shanghai - YouTube

The Herald reports on new central government statistics looking at the vulnerability of low-paid work to automation: 

Almost 42,000 East Devon jobs are at risk of being replaced by robots

04 April 2019

Sam Cooper, Miguel Rodriguez


You could soon be replaced by a robot as data reveals two out of every five jobs in East Devon could be lost to automation.

The data, measured in 2017 by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), shows that 42,000 jobs in the area could be partially or totally replaced by machines over the coming years. This equates to 44 per cent of occupations and of them, 9% of them are at high risk meaning they have a more than 70% chance of being replaced by machines.

The threat was medium for a further 60 per cent of jobs as the chances of automation are between 30 and 70 per cent.

The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) says technology will replace some occupations but will also bring new and more technical jobs.

East Devon was less vulnerable to the impact of automation in 2017 than six years earlier when 49 per cent of jobs were at risk of being replaced by machines.

The ONS analysed the jobs of 20 million people across England in 2017 and found that 7.4 per cent were at high risk of being replaced.

70 per cent of the roles at high risk of automation are currently held by women.

People aged 20 to 24 years old are most likely to be at risk of having their job replaced and low-skilled occupations, like waiting or shelf stacking, face the highest risk.

Jobs requiring higher qualifications, such as medical practitioners and higher education teachers, are less susceptible to computerisation.

An ONS spokesperson said: “The exact reasons for the decrease in the proportion of roles at risk of automation are unclear but it is possible that automation of some jobs has already happened. Additionally, while the overall number of jobs has increased, the majority of these are in occupations that are at low or medium risk suggesting that the labour market may be changing to jobs that require more complex and less routine skills.”

Felicity Burch, the CBI’s director of innovation and digital, said technology is predominantly putting jobs held by women and low-skilled occupations at risk.

She said: “The picture is complicated, as ONS’s own analysis shows that some of the roles most at risk of automation saw a boost in recent years. Furthermore, we know that the more businesses invest in new technology, the more likely they are to create new roles.


.
.
.

Out of Office > the future of work @ Radio 4

Do you get the feeling that you're in the wrong job? 

This is a piece from this blog from last August:  

The Wrong Job: the postwork civilization is a giant fraud 


This blog occasionally looks at the issues around 'work':

What's the point of work?
Why Work? | James Livingston
Futures Forum: Why work?

Why not be idle?
BBC Radio 4 - Archive on 4, Embracing Idleness, Idleness: relaxation or subversion?
Futures Forum: In Praise of Idleness: working less could actually be better for everyone.

It's better for us:
The Abolition of Work--Bob Black
'How to Be Idle': Being and Do-Nothingness - The New York Times
Futures Forum: Saint Monday: in defence of skiving

And the Hadza of the Kalihari should know:

Play Makes Us Human V: Why Hunter-Gatherers' Work is Play | Psychology Today
Futures Forum: In Praise of Idleness: "If Hadza nomads get by on 14 hours’ work a week, why can’t we?"
Futures Forum: On the Transition: "Future Primitive"



How about a 'post-capitalist utopia'?
Capitalism Will Abolish Laundry Day - Foundation for Economic Education
Fully Automated Luxury Communism! - YouTube
Futures Forum: The future of work: "Capitalism will abolish laundry day" >>> or: "Fully Automated Luxury Communism"

Or 'money for nothing'?
BBC Radio 4 - In Business, Kenya's Basic Income Experiment
Futures Forum: Universal Basic Income @ Radio 4's In Business

Because the current situation is hell:
Open plan offices 'killing' communication. Should we bring back cubicles? - inews
Futures Forum: Open-plan offices are killing face-to-face communication.

And people are revolting:
Video: the welcome, belated backlash to the open-plan office | FT Alphaville
Futures Forum: Knowle relocation project: Open-plan offices have been found to reduce productivity and impair memory. They’re associated with high staff turnover. They make people sick, hostile, unmotivated, and insecure.


Futures Forum: The Wrong Job: the postwork civilization is a giant fraud

"Out of Office", Radio 4's new series on the future of work, starts with an interview with David Graeber, author of "Bullshit Jobs" - a look at how disengaged we are from the world of work:


Episode 1

What do we want from work? Millions of people are now reinventing their working lives. Ruth Barnes presents the first in a new series exploring the changing world of work.
There are now five million self-employed people in the UK, it’s the fastest-growing group of workers. Sometimes it's a case of "needs must" as conventional industries collapse - but the evidence suggests that most are doing it because they want to, they see themselves as breaking free.
The internet is full of inspirational talks from the late Steve Jobs and others, exhorting us to take risks, set out on our own, make our fortune. But with the average freelancer earning only £240 a week - about half the earnings of the average employee - what is the price of freedom?
In this first programme, Breaking Free, Ruth hears from people who have reinvented their working lives, becoming taxi drivers, brewers or cleaners. She talks to David Graeber, an anthropology professor who tapped into something really big when he published his book Bullshit Jobs.
Ruth Barnes spent ten years as a producer and presenter at the BBC, covering music and culture across the national radio. She’s written and presented music documentaries for Radio 4, reported live from the Glastonbury Festival for BBC Radio 5 Live and the red carpet at the Cannes Film Festival for BBC Radio 2. In 2006, Ruth started her own online radio show The Other Woman, to showcase new music from female artists. She is three years into running her own podcast production company Chalk & Blade, an independent start-up based in East London.
Producers: Susan Marling and Elizabeth Burke
A Just Radio production for BBC Radio 4


BBC Radio 4 - Out of Office, Episode 1







.
.
.

Attenborough's "Our Planet" on Netflix tonight

The BBC wants to do more when it comes to covering the environment:
Futures Forum: BBC prioritises environment with new natural history programming

David Attenborough is very much the voice of the BBC on these issues - and he's very much the voice of the UK,  as when he spoke out at this year's Davos meeting:
Futures Forum: Climate change @ Davos

Later this spring, he will not be holding his punches:
Climate Change - The Facts: David Attenborough to present BBC1 documentary - Radio Times

And tonight he'll be doing the same, but on Netflix:
Our Planet Sir David Attenborough explains reason behind Netflix documentary | TV & Radio | Showbiz & TV | Express.co.uk
Why Sir David Attenborough was drawn to Netflix - The Scotsman

He has clearly been frustrated by the culture at the BBC:

David Attenborough's new Netflix series Our Planet is a direct rebuke of the BBC

With Attenborough’s brilliant new wildlife series on Netflix we finally have a show that doesn’t sugarcoat the natural world’s biggest challenges, and the first episode is a clear challenge to those who have

BY STUART MCGURK

Stuart McGurk is GQ's Associate Editor and the 2017 PPA Magazine Writer of the Year. Follow him on Twitter @stuartmcgurk
Tuesday 2 April 2019

Imagine, for a second, that a documentary about our solar system left it until the last five minutes to mention that, by the way, a meteor the size of Jupiter is on the way and it’s set to knock Earth directly into the sun, before rebounding off into almost every other planet in the solar system, in a rather remarkable intergalactic trick-shot.

It’d be slightly odd, wouldn’t it? You’d be sitting there, screaming at the TV: “Guys! Guys? Maybe the whole documentary could have been about this? Maybe you could have called the series Our Impending Fiery Hell Doom rather than The Planets?”

This is the feeling you’ll have watching the brilliant new Netflix series Our Planet – four years in the making, footage filming in 50 countries, voiced by Sir David Attenborough and made in conjunction with the WWF and your own overbearing sense of guilt.

The WWF part is particularly important: rather than the BBC’s practice of guiltily slipping in five minutes of a turtle caught in plastic at the end of 40 minutes of HDR wildlife porn, Our Planet puts human impact front and centre. The result – far from it being “lecturing” or “preachy” – simply makes you acutely aware how incredibly odd most of the BBC’s flagship natural world shows are: documentaries that document the Titanic by focusing on the on-board entertainment.

Still, a wildlife doc that does nothing but talk of potential doom is not a fun one, and the first episode of Our Planet walks the line expertly. It also ends with a sucker-punch that puts the BBC’s five-minute-environmental-aside model to shame.

...

Thursday, 4 April 2019

High streets staging a comeback

We need to be looking after our towns:
Futures Forum: 'Is it time to pay attention to towns as distinct types of places - both as sweet spots for understanding political change, and as laboratories for social policy?'

And one way might be some redirected money from central government - preferably not as part of any cynical ploy:
Futures Forum: Of Brexit bribes, the Strong Towns Fund and Local Enterprise Partnerships
Futures Forum: "Government announces small bit of funding for something that needs a bigger bit of funding" > 'Stronger Towns Fund' vs local government cuts

Maybe the 'Stronger Towns Fund' will help - but maybe towns will just have to help themselves better - as reported this evening on Radio 4: 

A Tale of Two Towns

Much has been made of the death of the high street, but some places are staging a comeback.
The government has announced this Spring a £1.6bn Stronger Towns Fund to help less well-off areas. Six hundred million pounds of that will be shared out to towns which can come up with credible plans to help their high street adapt to the rapidly changing retail environment.
So what does it take to turn a town around? In this programme, Ruth Alexander visits two towns in Cheshire - Northwich and Altrincham - which have tried two quite different approaches to see what works, and what doesn’t.
Presenter: Ruth Alexander
Producer: Elisabeth Mahy


BBC Radio 4 - In Business, A Tale of Two Towns

With more on Northwich:
Northwich runner-up in Great British High Street 'Rising Star' | Northwich Guardian
The Great British High Street Awards | The Great British High Street
Northwich High Street pub's 200-year-old history | Northwich Guardian

And on Altrincham:
Saving our shops as easy as pie - Lancashire Evening Post
Is this the secret to High Street success? - BBC News
From ghost town to boom town - how Altrincham became the place to be - Manchester Evening News
CHAMPION! Altrincham named England's best high street at the Great British High Street awards - Altrincham Today
.
.
.

Lists of candidates for District and Town Council elections 2nd May

There will be local elections on Thursday 2nd May:
Futures Forum: Good news from East Devon as it prepares for local elections

And a lot of independents will be standing:
Futures Forum: Independent candidates standing for council seats across Devon say they are "fed-up of being ignored by ruling political parties"

Today, Thursday 4th April, the complete lists of candidates have been published:

For the District Council election:
Elections - East Devon District council elections - East Devon
East Devon District Council Elections - 2 May 2019 - East Devon

And the three wards:
sidmouth-rural.pdf
sidmouth-sidford.pdf
sidmouth-town.pdf

With the current District councillors here:
Your Councillors - East Devon

For the Town Council election:
Elections - Parish and town council elections - East Devon
contested-towns-and-parishes.pdf

With the current Town councillors here:
Councillors - Sidmouth Town Council
.
.
.