The District Council's heritage planning officer has been consulting widely over their Heritage Strategy:
Futures Forum: East Devon Local List of Heritage Assets >>> process to go out to public consultation
Yesterday, the council's Strategic Planning Cttee met up to consider the results of this consultation:
Agenda for Strategic Planning Committee on Tuesday, 26th March, 2019, 10.00 am - East Devon
And the report's recommendations are as follows:
Heritage Strategy
Purpose of report:
To advise Members on the outcome of the public consultation on the
Heritage Strategy and propose that it be adopted.
Recommendation:
1. The East Devon Heritage Strategy 2019 -2031 be adopted
subject to amendments arising from the consultation as set out
in this report.
2. That a pilot scheme for a Conservation Area review involving the
community as described in the Heritage Strategy be agreed for
East Budleigh including the Otter Valley Association.
Reason for
recommendation:
To gain formal approval for the amended Heritage Strategy 2019 –
2031 and to gain approval for a pilot scheme involving the community
at East Budleigh.
Item 7 Heritage Strategy Committee Report.pdf
Congratulations to the Otter Valley Assn - who have really pushed for this strategy and listing:
Futures Forum: Community Assets @ Budleigh Salterton
Futures Forum: District Council postpones yet again its review into heritage assets
.
.
.
The Campaign to Protect Rural England has labelled the revised National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) a ‘speculative developers’ charter’, as the government published its new planning rulebook earlier today (24 July).
Despite a promise to ‘build attractive and better-designed homes in areas where they are needed’, CPRE points out that far from fulfilling this promise, the NPPF will continue to favour the delivery of any development, rather than development that meets communities’ needs, respects the environment, and adheres to policies in the NPPF other than those which deal with housing delivery.
CPRE’s key concern is the new ‘housing delivery test’. The NPPF continues to encourage councils to set high targets for housing delivery and this new policy has been produced to enforce this delivery. However, the ‘housing delivery test’ will penalise councils when house builders fail to deliver homes in their areas by removing local control over planning decisions. This in turn will leave them and the countryside open to speculative development.
CPRE have a number of other concerns, including:
- a failure to provide an effective brownfield first policy
- the continuing failure to support provision of affordable housing in rural areas
- the discouragement of neighbourhood planning because of uncertainty over the validity of plans older than two years
- continued implicit support for hydraulic fracturing for shale oil and gas, despite massive public opposition and little evidence of need
Matt Thomson, Head of Planning at the Campaign to Protect Rural England, said:
‘Rather than delivering “what communities want” as it claims to promise, the new planning rulebook and its new “housing delivery test” will result in almost all local plans becoming out of date within two years. It is a speculative developers’ charter and will lead to the death of the plan-led system.
‘Without a local plan, councils and communities have little control over the location and type of developments that take place. This results in the wrong developments in the wrong places - local communities’ needs are ignored and valued countryside destroyed for no good reason.’
Despite heavy criticism of the revised NPPF, CPRE are pleased to see that government has taken some positive actions. They include:
- National Parks and AONBs reinstated as having the ‘highest status of protection’
- maintaining Green Belt protections and an improved definition ‘exceptional circumstances’ for releasing land from Green Belts
- improved clarity and focus for policies on making better use of land
- clearer guidance for viability assessment and that price paid for land should never be a justification for viability revisions
- excluding National Parks, AONBs and Green Belts from the Entry Level Exceptions Sites policy
- ‘Social housing’ being reinstated in the definition of affordable housing.
CPRE will be providing further analysis of the revised NPPF shortly.









