... A FORUM TO STIMULATE DEBATE ... ... JUST ADD A COMMENT AT ANY ENTRY BELOW... ... FOR THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TOWN AND VALLEY ...

Sunday, 2 February 2014

Flooding in the West Country... and coastal communities

THE SOUTH WEST:

The weather has been particularly severe along these coast:
Warnings of danger to life as 'perfect storm' prepares to batter Devon's coast | Exeter Express and Echo

Stormy weather threat remains for South West coastal areas

1 February 2014

Evacuation advisory letterCornwall Council has advised some residents at risk of flooding to evacuate their properties at high tide

Related Stories

Coastal communities in Devon and Cornwall have been warned to remain on high alert as forecasters warn of further strong winds and high tides.
Stormy conditions have already caused some flooding and damage, but no major incidents have been reported.
Cornwall Council advised the evacuation of more than 100 homes in Bude and Portreath earlier, but only a few residents left their properties.
Two severe flood warnings remain in place for the north Cornwall coast.

Weather information

weather picture
From the BBC:
Elsewhere:
Heavy rain, hail, thunder and gale-force winds are forecast, with gusts of up to 70mph, which could force the high tide to breach sea defences and harbour walls.
A evacuation advisory letter - hand delivered to homes in Bude and Portreath - says people should again consider leaving their properties at the next high tide which is between 17:00 and 21:00 GMT.
The second highest tide of the year is expected on Sunday.
Snow also fell on high ground in both counties and with sub-zero road surface temperatures reported, drivers were warned about the risk of icy conditions.
The Environment agency has a live flood warning map showing where its flood alerts and warnings are in force and the public have been urged to stay away from coastal areas.
According to the Met Office, the region has experienced one of the wettest Januarys on record.

More on This Story

BBC News - Stormy weather threat remains for South West coastal areas

There have been several longer-term studies on the impact of flooding on coastal communities in the South-West:
www.nationaltrust.org.uk/document-1355766981103/
Storms have changed our coastline forever, according to Exeter University expert | Exeter Express and Echo


EAST DEVON:

Seaton has been hit badly:
Environment Agency - Flood Warning Area Detail
And there have been warnings:
Stand Up For Seaton (SU4S): The effects of flooding and climate change
Stand Up For Seaton (SU4S): The effects of climate change on flooding in the UK
www.environment-agency.gov.uk/static/documents/Leisure/_CFMP_East_Devon_2012.pdf

The Exe Estuary is particularly vulnerable:

THOUSANDS of pounds have been pledged by East Devon District Council in the hope of bringing forward a scheme that should prevent tonnes of sand being washed across the estuary from Exmouth to Dawlish. Concerns about sand being washed back and forth across the estuary have been going on for years. The sand spit jutting out into the mouth of the Exe estuary from Dawlish Warren serves as a natural coastal defence system. But a combination of climate change, tidal movements and storm events over the past few decades has left the shifting sands depleted, prompting concerns of a potential breach in the defences.

Thousands pledged by East Devon Council to prevent sand being washed away from estuary | Exeter Express and Echo
Flood defence schemes left unchecked as storm costs hit £16m in the South West | Exeter Express and Echo

And we have the Jurassic Coast's overall Management Plan for the Dorset and East Devon coasts:
Coastal erosion and coast protection - Jurassic Coast
New Management Plan for Jurassic Coast - Jurassic Coast


SIDMOUTH:

Sidmouth has its own issues with threats to its coast - and these have been considered by the draft Local Plan.
Here is a submission commenting on the provisions:

Whilst it is necessary to take reasonable care that proposals for coastal protection are feasible and sustainable, and will not harm the environment, a long list of conditions can be a recipe for inaction. 

This is particularly relevant to the situation at Sidmouth, where there has been significant erosion of the cliffs at Pennington Point over many years, but we have only just reached the stage of hopefully starting on preparation of a beach management plan - which may not be completed for many months, and which may or may not provide an answer to the problem, which is effective or acceptable to the parties involved. Please see a relevant report on the Sidmouth Herald website: 
http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/news/cash_pledge_boosts_sidmouth_cliffs_plan_1_2264407

Increased cliff erosion at Pennington Point has been occurring for many years. A report dated October 2009 by Royal Haskoning http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/eb_310310_item13_app1.pdf
However, the conclusion of the report (in the Summary) was that "...there is no immediate requirement for emergency works to be undertaken and that the town of Sidmouth is not at increased risk of flooding now or in the near future..."

The situation appears to have changed since completion of the above report - based on what people can see when looking at the cliffs. It seems that there has been considerable erosion at Pennington Point and along the cliffs East of Sidmouth since the Royal Haskoning report was completed in October 2009.

The fact that the Royal Haskoning report referred to above found that there has been "...a marked increase in erosion since 1996..." may give weight to the view that the rock islands are contributing to increased erosion at Pennington Point.

Para 94 of the National Planning Policy Framework provides as follows -
"94. Local planning authorities should adopt proactive strategies to mitigate and adapt to climate change,16 taking full account of flood risk, coastal change and water supply and demand considerations."

EDDC needs to take such a proactive approach in relation to the need to protect Pennington Point and the Eastern Cliffs, and the town of Sidmouth itself, from the effects of coastal erosion. In this respect, I would suggest that the new Local Plan is not sound, since it does not provide an effective strategy to deal with this issue.

www.eastdevon.gov.uk/3036-mrjohnlabrumch106.pdf

Next week, the Sidmouth East Beach Management Steering Group will be meeting:
Plan to shore up Sidmouth’s beaches for the future - News - Sidmouth Herald
Vision Group for Sidmouth - Futures Forum meets


TO CONCLUDE:

Coastal communities are facing an uncertain future:

Saving coastlines from flooding is an uncertain science

9 January 2014

Coastal and river flooding struck Britain again this week with huge waves hitting southern and western coasts and around 100 flood warnings still in place by Wednesday evening. Disturbing but, sadly, not unfamiliar scenes were accompanied by an impressive catalogue of disruption and bitter tales of avoidable personal tragedy.

But was this weather or climate? Must we expect more of these kinds of events and if so what can we do about it? As with all things climatic the answers are far from simple, but we can start with three basic facts.

First, a warmer atmosphere can hold more water, so at the simplest level, the global hydrological cycle is likely to intensify. This suggests it’s likely to get wetter somewhere, but not necessarily everywhere. Second, the ocean will expand as it warms, leading to rising average sea levels in the coming decades – this is one of the most confident predictions of climate-change science. Third, any melting of the continental ice sheets on Antarctica and Greenland would raise global sea levels further.

Of these three factors, only more intense storms would affect river flooding. Changes in storms are extremely difficult to predict, and will vary between regions, while river flooding is also affected by highly local factors related to soils and land use. If river flooding is changing already then the signal is not yet clear, but the evidence from the past is that relatively modest climate fluctuations since the last glacial period have been accompanied by substantial changes in flooding regimes.

But coastal flooding is another story. Although individual events are highly dependent on winds and tides, and hence subject to the same uncertainties as inland storm behaviour, the inexorable rise of sea level in response to ocean warming shifts the probability of coastal flooding steadily upwards.

The fact that the dynamics of ice sheets are hard to predict just means we can’t be sure how fast sea levels will rise, but the “likely” range from the IPCC is 26-82cm by 2100, so the uncertainty is as big as the signal itself. Indeed even predictions of the warming component of sea level rise depend on poorly understood processes such as the rate of transport of warm water to the deep ocean and typically vary by a factor of two.

Protection pays, but how much?

As rising sea levels will mean more coastal flooding it might seem the answer is clear – invest in sea defences now to avoid damaging floods before they happen. But how much to invest, where and when are much harder questions to answer. We’ve already seen that the rate of sea level rise is highly uncertain, but this is only one factor in the equation of cost versus benefit of sea defences.

Just as important is the value of land to be protected, which depends on how it is used. If land is built on, the degree of coastal development invokes public planning policy as well as private and commercial development decisions. And if land at risk is used for producing marketable agricultural or commercial output, then the value depends on the price of those goods on international markets.

Science or policy first?

Any decision of where and how much to invest in coastal protection is thoroughly mired in uncertainty. The rate of sea level rise is highly uncertain, and the statistics of individual flooding events even more so. The value at risk depends on the propensity for coastal versus inland development; and the fact that coastal economies are embedded in a globalised world means macroeconomic forces, including international trade, affect the cost-benefit calculation.

So far, the instinct of scientists and politicians has been to take a “science-first” approach, working forwards from the most complete possible scientific knowledge to the best possible decisions. But the science will never be complete and time is short. Much better, some have argued, to start from the policy end – prioritising the science that is necessary to choose between the policy options that are actually available, and using models as tools to explore the most relevant options.

Science first or policy first, we need better ways to making decisions under conditions of uncertainty. The ERMITAGE project has taken important steps in this direction by combining models of climate, economy and agricultural production. Initial results confirm earlier conclusions: money put into coastal protection pays for itself handsomely.


Saving coastlines from flooding is an uncertain science

See also:

Flooding in the West Country... and development

THE BIGGER PICTURE:

The arguments about 'what has caused flooding' are particularly fierce:
Futures Forum: Flooding in the West Country... and climate change
But it seems that there is agreement about the impact of 'over-development' on the landscape:

Concreting over flood plains, cutting down trees and expanding cities is making flooding much worse – and we need to act on that knowledge.

Climate change is NOT main cause of floods, say experts | Mail Online
Changing landscapes, not global warming, to blame for increased flood risk

Studies have shown that there is a clear link between population density and flooding. Currently 800 million humans are living in areas vulnerable to flooding. This is predicted to rise by a further 140 million during 21st Century as we see continued economic and population growth. At the same time reduction of woodland, changing river flow and the urbanisation of flood plains will increase flood risk in many regions.

T&F Newsroom
Taylor & Francis Online :: Flood risk and climate change: global and regional perspectives - Hydrological Sciences Journal -

The inconvenient truth: houses built on floodplains could flood

30 January 2014


















Role reversal: a river of land in fields of water. Tim Ireland/PA

Ministers should be applauded for recognising that there’s simply no way we could tell the thousands of key workers and low income families, desperate for a decent home, that we can’t build any more new homes because of concerns about flood plains.
David Orr, National Housing Federation, BBC News, 2007.

For the past six weeks, Somerset has experienced its most significant flooding in decades that have at last required calling out the army.

While commentators fixate on dredging rivers, or more sustainably planting trees, or reintroducing beavers as the solution to prevent more homes from being flooded, those with longer memories may cast them back to 2007, when much of central and southwestern England was underwater from some of the worst flooding in living memory.

Communities Minister Eric Pickles might like to consider the inconvenient truth of his own words in 2007 while in opposition. Following the floods, he said in response to Labour’s housing strategy that: “if you build houses on flood plains it increases the likelihood that people will be flooded”.
Recommendations ignored

But a general election later, in 2012 prime minister David Cameron is pledging to “cut through the dither” that is holding Britain in “paralysis” and has brought forward by contentious measures to relax rules on planning applications with an eye to boosting growth, and providing 75,000 new homes. The National Planning Policy Framework is proclaimed “simple”, and had reduced planning policy from more than 1,000 pages to under 100, said to pave the way for swifter, clearer decisions.

Otto Thoresen, director-general of the The Association of British Insurers, expressed immediate concern that the framework could lead to greater inappropriate development in flood risk areas, something that the current “rigorous planning system” was a bulwark against. The result, he predicted, would not be the “stimulation of the economy,” but “misery for people when their homes are flooded”.

The National Flood Forum’s chairman, Charles Tucker, similarly argued that the new framework “has, at a stroke, scrapped the carefully constructed raft of technical guidance, context and definitions built up over years” for flood protection.


The inconvenient truth: houses built on floodplains could flood

It does seem, however, that there are some in the construction industry who are taking this seriously:


Construction in a Changing Climate: 

Building for Resilience

Building for ResilienceThis CPD film is designed to support construction industry professionals in adapting to the impacts of extreme weather and climate change.  It has been produced by Climate SouthWest in partnership with Future Foundations and Constructing Excellence South West, and is supported by the Construction Clients’ Group.
 ‘Construction in a Changing Climate: building for resilience’ includes interviews with expert speakers, such as Professor Bill Gething author of  'Design for a Future Climate' (Technology Strategy Board 2010).  Featuring onsite case studies (covering homes, commercial buildings and new developments), we hear from a range of industry players who demonstrate how adapting to climate change has been integrated into the development, design and construction of their sites. 
You can view the film in full below.
.

Building for resilience - YouTube

CPD film: ‘Construction in a Changing Climate: building for resilience’

This CPD film is designed to support construction industry professionals in adapting to the impacts of extreme weather and climate change. It has been produced by Climate SouthWest in partnership with Future Foundations and Constructing Excellence South West, and is supported by the Construction Clients’ Group.

‘Construction in a Changing Climate: building for resilience’ includes interviews with expert speakers, such as Professor Bill Gething author of 'Design for a Future Climate' (Technology Strategy Board 2010). Featuring onsite case studies (covering homes, commercial buildings and new developments), we hear from a range of industry players who demonstrate how adapting to climate change has been integrated into the development, design and construction of their sites.
The key messages from the film are:
The climate is changing and the construction sector needs to take action. Our buildings are already affected by extreme weather and climate change will only make things worse.


Construction in a Changing Climate: Building for Resilience | Building a better South West
Climate Change | Building a better South West

There is a rather more explicit piece in today's Independent on Sunday:

The more the experts warn against, the more we build on flood plains
TOM BAWDEN , NATASHA CLARK  Sunday 02 February 2014

Flooding may have shot up the political agenda but that hasn't stopped local planning authorities driving through housing developments in areas at severe risk of flooding. 
From Cornwall to London, to Cardiff, Leeds and Northumberland, local authorities across England and Wales have been ignoring the Environment Agency's (EA) protests and waving through developments on flood-prone land. As Britain endures another weekend of torrential rain and further flooding, figures obtained by The Independent on Sunday reveal that last year local councils allowed at least 87 planning developments involving 560 homes to proceed in England and Wales in areas at such high risk of flooding that the EA formally opposed them.
The numbers of homes being built in the face of the EA's opposition are increasing markedly. That rise appears to be part of a broader trend, with developers seeking to push through more projects on land at high risk of flooding to satisfy demand for new houses. Last year, developers proposed 618 construction projects on land the agency deemed to be particularly high risk, an increase of more than a third on the previous year.
Dr Hannah Choke, a flooding expert from the University of Reading, said the figures were "disturbing". "The real problem with the Somerset Levels is that the people are no longer attuned to the landscape," she says. "In the past, everyone who lived there was attached to the agricultural system and they expected flooding. Now people live there because it's a nice place to live and they have lost touch and been removed from the functions of the landscape, so when flooding happens, it causes problems."

A 2012 report by the Government's official climate change adviser – the Climate Change Committee (CCC) – concluded that the planning policy "approval process is not sufficiently transparent or accountable". The report found that 13 per cent of all new developments were on flood plains. While many flood zone developments are well protected, one in five was in an area "of significant risk under today's climate". It noted that much of Britain is now so densely populated that developments on flood plains are growing much faster than those outside..


The more the experts warn against, the more we build on flood plains - Nature - Environment - The Independent

THE WEST COUNTRY:

But is it a question, not of homes vs greenfields, but of people vs wildlife?
Andrew Gilligan considers the issue in today's Sunday Telegraph 
- from the Somerset Levels:

Somerset floods: 'Is this area for people to live in or for animals?'

Andrew Gilligan 7:00AM GMT 02 Feb 2014

“Retreat is the only sensible policy,” says Colin Thorne, professor of physical geography at Nottingham University and a leading flood expert. “If we fight nature, we will lose in the end.” This view has until now strongly influenced government policy on the Levels. Much stress has been placed on the area’s role as a flood plain where people should expect to get wet. The perhaps brutal calculation has been that it was not worth spending millions dredging rivers and building barriers to protect a few thousand people – especially when the scientists say that it will merely buy time. 


“Can the Somerset Levels be defended between now and the end of the century? No,” says Prof Thorne. No explicit decision would be taken to abandon the Levels. But the much-hated end to the dredging of the area’s rivers, and the increased flooding that may have resulted, were at least pushing in that direction and letting nature, in at least some places, gradually take its course.

There are, however, a few problems for the “swampist tendency,” as Anthony Gibson, a former farmer’s union official now closely involved with efforts to plan for the area, calls them. The first, as he says, is that “the Levels are very far from a typical flood plain”. They are a deeply artificial, man-made environment, criss-crossed with rivers, canals and channels whose banks have been built up higher than the surrounding land to carry large volumes of water through and out of the area. Because of these banks, the water level in the two main local rivers, the Parrett and the Tone, is up to 10ft higher than the land around it. In flood times, when the rivers burst even these banks, floodwater cannot escape until the level of water in the river is lower than the level on the land around it, and that can take months. Unless you completely destroy the man-made banks, letting the Levels flood more often would not, says Gibson, lead to the lovely natural marsh with wading birds envisaged by the more romantic swampists. Instead, it would create a “slimy, stinking mess” of foetid, stagnant floodwater, unable to escape, finishing off not just the farming and the people but also much of the wildlife. This, indeed, is what happened in 2012.

The other problem, of course, is the politics. The people of the Levels have businesses, homes, rights, and votes. And ghastly as the last month has been for many of them, being in the national spotlight has quite clearly reset the issue in their favour.


Somerset floods: 'Is this area for people to live in or for animals?' - Telegraph


SIDMOUTH:

Whilst there has been controversy about putting housing where there were once grazing cows on meadowland to the north of Sidmouth...
www.sidmouth.gov.uk/PDFs/Planning Minutes 2009-10/Planmin 16.12.09.pdf
Flood report reveals bid to better understand River Sid - News - Sidmouth Herald
Sidmouth flooding latest - Weather - Sidmouth Herald

... the most contentious piece of planning recently has been the proposed area of employment land between Sidford and Sidbury:

It is totally inconsistent that EDDC should seek to extend the boundary at Sidford, not only into the AONB but also into land which has been classified by The Environment Agency as Flood Zone 3b, the worst possible category of floodplain, for industrial development. 

This site was previously rejected for development by EDDC on 23rd October 1978 (ref LP7/328/357/GCG) because it is in an AONB, is subject to flooding, is situated over an aquifer where pollution could contaminate the water supply, and the roads are too narrow

Flooding is now more extensive and, according to the Halcrow Group report (2008), will be worse still by 2025 to the extent that even Flood Zone 2 will become Flood Zone 3a. Surface water flows down the hills, across the proposed access road and across the field like a river.

www.eastdevon.gov.uk/6184-mariannerixson-variouschanges.pdf

Whilst the initial proposals for development of employment land at Sidford refer to ‘sustainable development’ and that ‘The proposals for the site fully address on and off-site flood risk and make full provision for these in accordance with current planning policy (NPPF and local policy) and the current requirements of the Environment Agency’ www.eastdevon.gov.uk/1967-fordscontextlogic josephmarchant-6_133efloodriskassessment.pdf – and whilst the District Council describes the site as  Flood Zone 2 in its Local Plan documentation http://maps2.eastdevon.gov.uk/mapping/localplan/, 
the Halcrow Group rates most of the site as Flood Zone 3B http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/plg_sframainreport01.pdf which the Environment Agency itself clearly warns about Environment Agency - Watch our short animation of surface water flooding. (See‘Sustainable development’ at Sidford Fields? | Save Our Sidmouth, EAFloodmapSidford.)

Vision Group for Sidmouth - VGS Futures Forum - comment on District Council Local Plan

There is also the potential area for redevelopment at Port Royal - which has its own mixture of fluvial and marine flooding issues:

Importantly, Port Royal lies in a flood‐risk area; this is even acknowledged in the discredited Royal Haskoning Report:  
“2. It would not lead to unacceptable pressure on services and would not adversely affect risk of flooding or coastal erosion” 
Upwards of 30 dwellings at Port Royal would have a considerable impact on the historic East Ham area: 
“3. It would not damage, and where practical, it will support promotion of wildlife, landscape, townscape or historic interests.” 
The current needs of Sidmouth as a tourist venue means that the Port Royal area should maintain if not enhance facilities and amenities to match current population and visitors: 
“4. It would not involve the loss of land of local amenity importance or of recreational value;” 
And because the Port Royal Steering Group’s Report has not been considered, any proposals to build 30 dwellings could prejudice development of the whole East Ham area: 
“6. It would not prejudice the development potential of an adjacent site.”

http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/eb_310310_item13_app1.pdf 

See also:
Futures Forum: Latest flooding news - its effect on key issues
Futures Forum: Persimmon, Sidmouth and "promoting well-designed housing that is sustainable and provides much-needed new housing..."
Futures Forum: "It has not been demonstrated that development in the highly protected AONB landscape is essential."
Futures Forum: Sidford plans in detail
Futures Forum: Plans for Port Royal: VGS and PRSG
.
.
.

Flooding in the West Country... and climate change

THE BIGGER DEBATE:

In the English-speaking world, the subject of climate change is still an 'issue'...
Public opinion on climate change - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the UK:
Owen Paterson faces choice between ideology and evidence - 04 Sep 2012 - James' Blog: a blog from BusinessGreen.
Owen Paterson, his sceptic brother-in-law, and how Defra went cold on climate change - UK Politics - UK - The Independent
Owen Paterson's climate change scepticism 'has blinded him to future flooding risks', claims Labour as winter storm continues to batter Britain - UK Politics - UK - The Independent
Number of climate sceptics rising in the UK, survey finds | Environment | theguardian.com
What climate change? Fewer people than EVER believe the world is really warming up | UK | News | Daily Express

In the US:
Most climate change sceptics in US, UK and Japan - Telegraph
Why Are Americans So Ill-Informed about Climate Change? - Scientific American
Newspapers in UK and US give climate sceptics most column inches | Environment | theguardian.com

In Australia:
The No Carbon Tax Climate Sceptics Party
Sceptics put heat on climate change | The Australian
Big Australian media reject climate science
Wasting energy on climate change sceptics - The Drum (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Know any climate change sceptics? Turn off their air conditioning | Kevin Hawkins | Comment is free | theguardian.com

An interesting comment has been widely reported in this weekend's press from Prince Charles, who was handing out prizes to Young Sustainability Entrepreneurs:

"It is baffling, I must say, that in our modern world we have such blind trust in science and technology that we all accept what science tells us about everything – until, that is, it comes to climate science. All of a sudden, and with a barrage of sheer intimidation, we are told by powerful groups of deniers that the scientists are wrong and we must abandon all our faith in so much overwhelming scientific evidence. So, thank goodness for our young entrepreneurs here this evening, who have the far-sightedness and confidence in what they know is happening to ignore the headless chicken brigade and do something practical to help."

"Perhaps it has been too uncomfortable for those with vested interests to acknowledge, but we have spent the best part of the past century enthusiastically testing the world to utter destruction; not looking closely enough at the long-term impact our actions will have."


Prince Charles: climate change deniers are 'headless chickens' - Telegraph

But whilst the Telegraph was too polite to criticise the Prince, the Mail and Express were not:
Prince of Wales hits out at climate change deniers... labelling them the 'headless chicken brigade' | Mail Online
Climate change deniers are 'headless chickens' says Prince Charles | UK | News | Daily Express


CLIMATE CHANGE AND FLOODING IN THE UK:

It seems, then, that an understanding of the current flooding will be framed within the climate change debate - although, it is a little more nuanced when you look at the details...

David Cameron has linked the widespread floods and bad weather affecting the UK to climate change, saying he “strongly suspects” the phenomenon is causing more “abnormal weather events”. In comments that are likely to anger some Conservatives who are sceptical of climate change, the Prime Minister told MPs: “We are seeing more abnormal weather events. Colleagues across the house can argue about whether that is linked to climate change or not. I very much suspect that it is." Owen Paterson, the environment secretary, has been accused by Labour of being "blinded" to the risks of flooding by his climate change scepticism.
The Prime Minister was responding to a question from Tim Farron MP, the Lib Dem President, who said: "The science is clear that the extreme weather conditions affecting our communities are a destructive and inevitable consequence at least in part of climate change."
Mr Cameron said: “The point is whatever one’s view [on climate change] it makes sense to invest in flood defences, it makes sense to invest in mitigation, it makes sense to get the information out better. We should do all of those things.”
David Cameron 'very much suspects' climate change causing abnormal weather such as floods - Telegraph
Exeter-based Met Office expert backs PM's claim that the increase in 'abnormal' weather is linked to climate change | Exeter Express and Echo

The debate about climate change is distracting us from the true causes of flooding, a group of eminent scientists warned yesterday. Concreting over flood plains, cutting down trees and expanding cities is making flooding much worse – and we need to act on that knowledge, they said. The exact link between global warming and flooding is much less certain, and those who keep pursuing the topic are taking attention away from the true problem of over-development, they said in a research paper.
The paper, published in the Hydrological Sciences Journal yesterday, says: ‘There is such a furore of concern about the linkage between greenhouse forcing [the process by which man-made greenhouse gases are said to force climate change] and floods that it causes society to lose focus on the things we already know for certain about floods and how to mitigate and adapt to them. ‘The linkages between enhanced greenhouse forcing and flood phenomena are highly complex and it has not been possible to describe the connections well, either by empirical analysis or by the use of models,’
Bob Ward, policy director at the London School of Economics Grantham Institute, disagreed, warning that talking about climate change is vital to the debate. ‘Four of the five wettest years on record in the UK have all occurred since 2000, with 2012 being the second wettest, and this winter shaping up to be the wettest ever,’ he said.
Climate change is NOT main cause of floods, say experts | Mail Online
Climate change not main cause of floods, scientists suggest - Telegraph
Taylor & Francis Online :: Flood risk and climate change: global and regional perspectives - Hydrological Sciences Journal -

A freedom of information request has revealed that the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) is cutting spending for "climate change initiatives" to only £17.2m this financial year. This is 41% less than the year before. It is feared slashing the funds will mean a greater risk of issues related to flooding and other global warming consequences in the UK. Bob Ward, policy director at the London School of Economics' Grantham Research Institute, commented: "These shocking figures should worry everyone in the UK. Defra is the lead government department for climate change adaptation and is primarily responsible for making the UK resilient to the impacts of global warming, such as increased flood risk."
Paterson slashes UK climate change budget - News in Brief - The Ecologist
Exclusive: Climate scepticism blamed as Owen Paterson slashes spending on global warming - UK Politics - UK - The Independent

Questions about the link between flooding in the UK and climate change could be answered within two years, according to a leading scientist.
Prof Myles Allen from Oxford University said the only thing holding back the work was the lack of investment. Around £10m a year would provide a real-time attribution system on the role of humans in extreme weather. He said it was a "scandal" that the public should be denied clarity on this issue. Scientists are notoriously cautious about linking single weather events, such as the recent storms and flooding in the UK, to rising global temperatures. Researchers can discern a human fingerprint in extreme weather, but it has required huge amounts of computing power to calculate all the possible outcomes.
BBC News - Lack of research linking climate change and floods is a 'scandal'

As more heavy rain, high tides and gale force winds were forecast to bring further flooding to parts of Britain this weekend, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published its final report breaking down the impact of global warming for individual areas. It is the first time it has brought climate models together to make seasonal and regional projections. Britain will also see greater rainfall in the next two decades, with a maximum of 12 per cent more rainfall and an average rise of 4 per cent.

Dr Peter Stott, the head of climate monitoring and attribution at the Met Office Hadley Centre, agreed that Britain is likely to see wetter and warmer temperatures in future. “We are seeing more extreme temperatures and more intense rainfall events around the world. The expectation in a warming world is for an increased frequency of heatwaves and greater moisture in a warmer atmosphere is expected to lead extreme precipitation events, more intense and more frequent.”


Winter deluges may become the norm for Britain - Telegraph

The deluge that has engulfed southern and central England in recent weeks is the worst winter downpour in almost 250 years, according to figures from the world's longest-running weather station. The rainfall measured at the historic Radcliffe Meteorological Station at Oxford University in January was greater than for any winter month since daily recording began there in 1767, and three times the average amount. The latest Met Office data shows that the region from Devon to Kent and up into the Midlands suffered its wettest January since its records began in 1910. But Ian Ashpole, the Radcliffe Meteorological Observer, said: "The Radcliffe measurements more than double the length of the Met Office record and give us a better grip on how things are changing."
Flooding has been identified as the most dangerous impact of climate change for the UK and is hitting harder and faster than expected, according to scientists. Thousands of homes have been flooded since December, and much of the low-lying Somerset Levels remains under water.
January was England's wettest winter month in almost 250 years | UK news | The Observer

CLIMATE CHANGE AND FLOODING IN THE WEST COUNTRY:

The particular focus currently is on the Somerset Levels:
Flooding experts have warned that the increasing frequency and severity of flooding that will likely be caused by climate change may mean the Levels will eventually have to be abandoned to the sea.
“You are looking at retreat”, Prof Colin Thorne of the University of Nottingham told the Guardian. “It is the only sensible policy – it makes no sense to defend the indefensible. Can the Somerset Levels be defended between now and the end of the century? No.”
Hannah Cloke, associate professor in hydrology at the University of Reading, agreed, saying “We could make the choice to protect the Levels forever, but that is going to take a lot of resources. My gut feeling is that you are going to have to let that be a marshland in the end.”
UK weather: more flooding expected in south and west - Blue and Green Tomorrow

Government-funded landscape experiments in Somerset and Yorkshire are demonstrating that blocking upland drainage channels, replanting trees next to rivers and deliberately flooding fields can protect downstream homes by slowing the flow of water, which stops waters rising fast and reduces the silting up of channels.

Flooding experts say Britain will have to adapt to climate change – and fast | Environment | theguardian.com

The current floods are causing enormous distress to people living and working in communities such as Muchelney and Moorland, and have resulted in appalling damage to some homes and businesses. And being part of the Levels community ourselves, we share and understand their worries, their frustrations. It's really tough at the moment.

Living in a major floodplain, generations of Somerset people have learned to adapt to the floods, but the scale of flooding over the last two years tells us we need to look urgently at how we manage water, and how we make ourselves resilient to climate change. These floods warn us that we must face up to what's coming – significant long-term changes in rainfall patterns, including wetter winters and more frequent spring and summer downpours as well.


We must work together to overcome floods | Western Daily Press

The impact of climate change - especially milder, wetter winters - on the South West has been considered quite seriously by the local media:

Future climate change in the South West

It is predicted that the South West will experience hotter, drier summers and warmer wetter winters.
By 2050, according to the UKCP09 projections, the South West will experience hotter summers with an increase in average summer temperature of between 1.3 - 4.6 °C on the current average summer temperature. The hottest summer days could rise by as much as 7°C although it is more likely to be around 4°C. Average winter temperatures are also set to rise with an expected increase of between 1.1 - 3.6 °C on that which is currently experienced today.
In terms of precipitation, the total annual rainfall is unlikely to change, however, the patterns of rainfall could shift with total summer rainfall likely to decrease by around 20% and winter rainfall predicted to rise by a similar amount.
The key findings from the UKCP09 medium emissions scenario for the South West region for the 2020s, 2050s and 2080s are shown in the South West Region Emissions Scenarios (pdf, 20kb)(opens in a new window)  table.
Future climate change in the South West - dorsetforyou.com
How the South West is preparing to weather storms of climate change | Western Daily Press

Utility companies and government agencies are also taking it very seriously:
Climate change - the wider picture - South West Water
South West | English Heritage
Natural England - Climate change project

There is a considerable amount of research available on how to understand, as well as to prepare for, climate change in the South West:
Climate SouthWest's old site archive - main site now at climatesouthwest.org
SWCouncils - South West Climate Change Action Plan
climatesouthwest.org/library/Tools/South_West_FINAL1.pdf
www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/ClimateChangeSeminars_Climate_SWE_030707.pdf/$FILE/ClimateChangeSeminars_Climate_SWE_030707.pdf
Adapting to Climate Change – developing local preparedness in the South West | Sustainable Health South West
www.devon.gov.uk/topic_paper_2_-_climate_change.pdf
Vulnerability to heatwaves and drought: adaptation to climate change | Joseph Rowntree Foundation
ukclimateprojections.metoffice.gov.uk/media.jsp?mediaid=88427&filetype=pdf

For a rather naughty alternative take on flooding and climate change: 
from an Exeter University student...


CLIMATE CHANGE AND FLOODING IN SIDMOUTH:

The Vision Group will be hosting an event on these issues next month:

What do we know now about the changing world climate? How does it impact us? Do the recent extreme events indicate that our climate is changing? What can we do to minimise our consumption of resources and impact on our climate?

Vision Group for Sidmouth - Climate change, Energy, Extreme Events

See also:
Futures Forum: "Limits to adaptation to climate change: a risk approach:" event 16th December
Futures Forum: The Center for Climatic Research in Madison, Wisconsin... and climate change
Futures Forum: The national press and the IPCC report... and Climate Change
Futures Forum: Climate Change: the film
.
.
.

Saturday, 1 February 2014

"Independents, Independents, Independents."

There seems to be increasing hostility towards 'party politics' at both a local and national level:

A response to the East Devon MP having "no choice but to support the government" in its Lobby Bill
Futures Forum: Concerns for campaigning: Lobbying Bill to become law
has been to:

Get ‘em out – Independents, Independents, Independents. The party system is not fit for purpose in a modern world where their attempts to impose the will of the extreme view (in all parties) is an insult to their more sensible adherents.

This followed on from the publishing of correspondence with Hugo Swire MP on the matter:

The party machine does seem invincible:

But there are interesting moves around the country...
It 's often Independents who are the only body able to challenge policy:
Independents protest against Wiltshire Council’s allowances increase (From The Wiltshire Gazette and Herald)
Success at local level can be a spur to seeking national independent representation:
Isle of Wight: Independents set sights on Parliament

But, primarily, independents can think and work independently of the party machine:

Calls for people to stand as independent councillors

Three wannabe councillors hoping to stand in this year’s local elections say they want to see a change in local politics. Members of the public are being invited to an information event next week to find out how to become a councillor. The Harrow Times spoke to three prospective councillors hoping to run in May’s elections as independents, and who are calling on others to get involved.
Georgia Weston, who will be running in the Headstone North, said: “I don’t think many people realise that anyone can stand as a councillor and you don’t need a political party to back you. “It would be great to see an independent standing in every ward. I believe all councillors should live in the ward they represent. They should use our shops, walk our pavements and throw rubbish in our bins.”
Linda Robinson, who hopes to stand as an independent in Stanmore Park ward, said: “My main reason for standing is to give something different to people in Harrow. I think councillors should listen to the concerns of their constituents. Personally I'm very interested in sustainability issues in borough and doing more for the environment."
Richard Turner hopes to run in Headstone South. She said: “I have always been interested in politics both nationally and locally but I don’t think any of the parties really speak for what I believe in. I think there is a real lack of engagement between councillors and the electorate and there needs to be something done to improve communication. I think there is a lot of dissatisfaction from people when you look at the national picture and it’s the same with the council.”
Calls for people to stand as independent councillors (From Harrow Times)

Of course, it has a lot to do with disenchantment with the established parties - and this is happening elsewhere:
More Voters Call Themselves Independents - Washington Wire - WSJ
Karl Rove: Independents Will Decide the 2014 Elections - WSJ.com
.
.
.