Futures Forum: The four-hour working week, the sharing economy and going beyond the master-servant relationship
The dominance of technology is clear:
Futures Forum: Creating/destroying jobs >>> Creative Destruction and Artificial Intelligence
Futures Forum: Artificial Intelligence: 'complements labor and increase its productivity'
Futures Forum: Technological unemployment and the Luddite fallacy
And for those at Davos last month, the future is clear:
The Fourth Industrial Revolution:
what it means, how to respond
We stand on the brink of a technological revolution that will fundamentally alter the way we live, work, and relate to one another. In its scale, scope, and complexity, the transformation will be unlike anything humankind has experienced before. We do not yet know just how it will unfold, but one thing is clear: the response to it must be integrated and comprehensive, involving all stakeholders of the global polity, from the public and private sectors to academia and civil society.
The First Industrial Revolution used water and steam power to mechanize production. The Second used electric power to create mass production. The Third used electronics and information technology to automate production. Now a Fourth Industrial Revolution is building on the Third, the digital revolution that has been occurring since the middle of the last century. It is characterized by a fusion of technologies that is blurring the lines between the physical, digital, and biological spheres.
There are three reasons why today’s transformations represent not merely a prolongation of the Third Industrial Revolution but rather the arrival of a Fourth and distinct one: velocity, scope, and systems impact. The speed of current breakthroughs has no historical precedent. When compared with previous industrial revolutions, the Fourth is evolving at an exponential rather than a linear pace. Moreover, it is disrupting almost every industry in every country. And the breadth and depth of these changes herald the transformation of entire systems of production, management, and governance.
The possibilities of billions of people connected by mobile devices, with unprecedented processing power, storage capacity, and access to knowledge, are unlimited. And these possibilities will be multiplied by emerging technology breakthroughs in fields such as artificial intelligence, robotics, the Internet of Things, autonomous vehicles, 3-D printing, nanotechnology, biotechnology, materials science, energy storage, and quantum computing.
Already, artificial intelligence is all around us, from self-driving cars and drones to virtual assistants and software that translate or invest. Impressive progress has been made in AI in recent years, driven by exponential increases in computing power and by the availability of vast amounts of data, from software used to discover new drugs to algorithms used to predict our cultural interests. Digital fabrication technologies, meanwhile, are interacting with the biological world on a daily basis. Engineers, designers, and architects are combining computational design, additive manufacturing, materials engineering, and synthetic biology to pioneer a symbiosis between microorganisms, our bodies, the products we consume, and even the buildings we inhabit.
The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means and how to respond | World Economic Forum
Davos 2016: Forget the markets – the Fourth Industrial Revolution is here | Voices | The Independent
The fourth industrial revolution is almost upon us: Bring on the robotics, but with roboethics | The Drum
This is the take from the New Economics Foundation:
Is this what the future of work looks like?
Photo credit: Dan Ruscoe
JANUARY 25, 2016 // BY: KAREN JEFFREY
Last week, more than 2,000 leaders from business and politics gathered at the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) annual meeting to discuss the Earth’s most pressing issues.
Top of this year’s agenda is WEF’s report on The Future of Jobs introducing the idea of the coming “Fourth Industrial Revolution”.
A Fourth Industrial Revolution
With the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” – a term coined by World Economic Forum founder, Klaus Schwab – developments in robotics, artificial intelligence, 3D printing and nanotechnology are predicted to seriously disrupt the jobs market as we know it.
The Future of Jobs suggests that between now and 2020, a combination of job creation, job displacement, heightened labour productivity, and widening skills gaps are likely to result in a net loss of 5.1 million jobs.
The majority of losses are predicted to be in routine white collar office functions, manufacturing and production roles, with significant job creation in computing, mathematical and engineering related fields.
A polarised debate around what such disruptions might mean has been gathering momentum in recent years, simultaneously predicting utopia and catastrophe.
At one pole is Uber CEO, Travis Kalanik, who predicts limitless opportunities in yet to be conceived job markets, and greater productivity “freeing up” workers from routine toil.
At the other pole, Stephen Hawking has warned of an explosion in inequality and undermining of democracy, which will reduce the majority to lives of misery.
This camp says tech pioneers, investors in new technologies, certain scientists and certain nations will benefit, while workers, people and nations already partially excluded from the global economy, and potentially even the middle classes in richer nations, will lose out.
Whichever camp you fall into, it’s clear that the outcome will be determined by actions taken now.
Harnessing the Fourth Industrial Revolution for the common good
The authors of The Future of Jobs echo the advice of MIT-based academics, Brynjolfsson and McAfee – that lifetime learning and continued training and retraining are key – including government intervention to support these changes: an action plan which President Obama alluded to in his State of the Union Address earlier this month.
Meanwhile, others have identified this as an opportunity for more systemic change that could take us closer to a new economic system in which everyone’s needs are provided for within planetary boundaries.
An array of interesting suggestions have been made to date, including provision of a Basic Income Guarantee or Universal Basic Income, or transition to a post-capitalist global society involving liberation from work.
If predictions about disruption to the employment landscape are correct, exploring the viability of such options isn’t just a political imperative - it could also be in the economic interests of those who stand to benefit most from the predicted changes.
After all, without a class of consumers able to purchase products, those who own the technology could find themselves without customers and therefore without an income.
ISSUES
Is this what the future of work looks like? | New Economics Foundation
See also:
Futures Forum: Work is a four-letter word
Futures Forum: The sharing economy: the good, the bad, and the real
Futures Forum: Live more: work less... earn less... spend less... emit and degrade less
Futures Forum: In Praise of Idleness: working less could actually be better for everyone.
Futures Forum: The four-hour working week, the sharing economy and going beyond the master-servant relationship
.
.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment