Saturday, 2 August 2014

On the River Otter: Five reasons why we should [not] reintroduce beavers to Britain's rivers

The media buzz on beavers continues:
Futures Forum: On the River Otter: the media behaving badly over beavers

On the BBC's Countryfile website, there's been a vigorous debate on why and why not to 'bring back the beaver':

Five reasons why we should reintroduce beavers to Britain's rivers

1789 was a bad year for British wetlands and wildlife. That year, the last bounty was paid for a Eurasian beaver skull in Britain. This entirely vegetarian animal, native to Europe and Asia, plays a vital role in shaping our landscape. Lost from Britain once, we need it back.
1. Our wetland species evolved alongside beavers
Ever since the last ice age our wetland plants and animals lived in wetlands created by beavers and adapted to rely on them - look at the way trees like willow, alder and aspen regenerate when cut.  Beavers coppice trees to stimulate fresh growth, and so open out our river banks and wetlands for other species to thrive. They are remarkable water engineers and create an amazing mosaic of dams, ponds, and canals.
2. Two thirds of all British wetland species are supported by ponds
Almost all ponds are now man-made – because all the beavers have gone. In the Devon Beaver Project site, our family of beavers have made over 10 ponds in 3 years benefitting a wonderful array of dragonflies, birds and amphibians.  The 10 clumps of frogspawn laid in 2011 increased to 370 clumps this year!
3. Our rivers and wetlands are sick
They have been drained and over-engineered to get the water off the land and out to sea as quickly as possible. We suffer floods when it rains and dry rivers during droughts, and our wetland wildlife is massively depleted. Beavers are the medicine. They reinvigorate these wetlands, and hold water back in the headwaters, reducing the risk of flooding and ensuring a more constant flow of water during drier periods – better for mayflies, dippers and fish.  And the rivers are cleaner as the dams filter out the sediment and other pollutants.
4. Natural rivers are best for fish
Across most of Europe and North America, beavers are generally considered beneficial for fish like trout, and the science appears to support this. They create braided meandering rivers, with clean and extensive spawning gravels for fish. The evidence suggests that young fish grow faster and return to sea healthier if they live in beaver ponds.  Despite this some British anglers seem concerned that re-introduced beavers will dam rivers so securely that salmon will be unable to migrate up to their spawning gravels – despite the fact that our native fish evolved alongside beavers.
5. People want them back
Many other countries in Europe have now reintroduced beavers, driven in part by the great affection that people feel for this large charismatic plant-eating rodent.  In the Knapdale area of Scotland, one local hotelier has reported that 20% of his 2013 guests were there because of the reintroduced beavers. And we have absolutely nothing to fear. Beavers are slow to spread, and stay within a few metres of rivers and streams.  They are also easy to control and any disease risks and adverse impacts can be managed. Devon Wildlife Trust is seeking to use the small wild and breeding population now living on the River Otter as an opportunity to study these impacts in a real life lowland British landscape.

 Mark Elliott is the Working Wetlands Project Manager at the Devon Wildlife Trust

Beavers in Britain's rivers: five reasons why they should be reintroduced | Countryfile.com

Five reasons why we should not reintroduce beavers to Britain's rivers

The Angling Trust warmly welcomes Defra’s commitment to capture and return to captivity a number of beavers which have escaped from captivity – or have more likely been illegally released – into the River Otter in Devon for the following five reasons:
1. Our rivers have changed dramatically
Although beavers were native to some parts of the British Isles more than 500 years ago, our rivers have changed dramatically in the past five centuries and suffer from endemic pollution, over-abstraction of water and the presence more than 20,000 weirs and dams which act as barriers to fish migration.  Nearly all fish species, not just trout and salmon, need to migrate up and down rivers in order to complete their life cycle and the addition of beaver dams would only increase the number of obstacles that fish have to overcome.  If we remove all these barriers to migration, then beavers present less of a problem to fisheries.
2. It would be irresponsible
In a healthy natural ecosystem, beavers can actually be beneficial because they introduce woody debris to rivers and their dams can trap silt and create new habitats.  However, fewer than 25% of England and Wales’ rivers are in good ecological condition and the Angling Trust’s view is that it would be irresponsible even to consider reintroducing this species into the wild without first restoring our rivers to good health by tackling low flows, pollution and removing the vast majority of man-made barriers to fish migration.
3. Beavers can spread fatal diseases
Beavers imported from abroad have the potential to spread the tapeworm Echinococcus multilocularis which can spread to dogs and humans, for whom it can be fatal.  Britain is currently free of this parasite.
4. They pose a risk to infrastructure
Evidence from North America and Germany shows the considerable risk to infrastructure – including flood defence assets, roads and railways – from allowing beavers to become established in high risk and populated areas.  An adult beaver can bring down a 10 inch wide tree in under an hour, and a single beaver family will fell up to 300 trees a year.  In the upper Danube region of Germany, beavers have caused £5 million of damage.  How will riverside residents feel when the only tree in their garden is gnawed down overnight?  Or a beaver dam floods a housing estate that has never before flooded?  The problem with beavers is that they are very secretive and mainly nocturnal, and they don’t stay put, so they will spread from rural areas to villages and the edges of towns and cities.
5. Consultation is necessary
The beavers in Devon were almost certainly released illegally by some enthusiasts who believe they can take a unilateral decision on behalf of the whole nation; there was no democratic decision taken with proper consultation with local people, businesses and landowners to seek their views.

 Mark Lloyd is the Chief Executive of the Angling Trust

Beavers in Britain's rivers: five reasons why they should not be reintroduced | Countryfile.com

Thanks to: Friends of The Byes / Sidmouth BEE Project | Facebook

No comments: